Interesting. Scholarship reductions are still in effect, however?
Why is this on the Gopher board?
Sure there will be plenty that disagree but I am totally Ok with this. I hate the idea that current players and coaches get punished for the actions of people that are no longer associated with the program in any way.
Good. They shouldn't have received any athletics sanctions in the first place.
Sure there will be plenty that disagree but I am totally Ok with this. I hate the idea that current players and coaches get punished for the actions of people that are no longer associated with the program in any way.
Isn't nearly always the case with NCAA sanctions? The players/coaches committing the infractions usually are no longer there(Reggie Bush). Should there be no sanctions on programs where the ones committing the infractions are no longer there?
Same here. If you want to hate what was done; hate the ones that were guilty of the actions, not the ones that are there now.
Totally different situations. It is nearly always the case with the ncaa because they are ncaa infractions and it is the only avenue the ncaa has to 'punish' the guilty parties. They have to punish the schools because the coaches and players have moved on. The ncaa will attribute it to 'lack of institutional control'. That term is often miss-used.
In the case of psu; they are charged with criminal offenses. The actual guilty parties will be held accountable in criminal and civil charges.........see Jerry Sandusky.
The NCAA is not part of our legal system or government!
Station, we've butted heads on this topic before I believe - but I'll reiterate my position again, just so my side of the coin is represented.
While in concept, your position seems logical and fair - the problem is that the overarching CULTURE that football was king in Happy Valley, and was too big to fail and led to a string of bad decisions, failures to follow up, and downright criminal negligence. I'm not certain much of anything was done to de-emphasize the importance of football over kids being raped. Look at the idiot students who rioted, and the Joe-Bots still walk among us with their heads high. I just don't feel that a year or two of NCAA wrist-slapping and backpedaling is enough to correct the culture of a community that placed football on such a high pedestal that their decision-makers couldn't bear to allow it to fail. Current players and coaches were free to leave and play football elsewhere, so its not as if the sanctions forced them to be punished.
Totally different situations. It is nearly always the case with the ncaa because they are ncaa infractions and it is the only avenue the ncaa has to 'punish' the guilty parties. They have to punish the schools because the coaches and players have moved on. The ncaa will attribute it to 'lack of institutional control'. That term is often miss-used.
In the case of psu; they are charged with criminal offenses. The actual guilty parties will be held accountable in criminal and civil charges.........see Jerry Sandusky.
The NCAA is not part of our legal system or government!
Station, we've butted heads on this topic before I believe - but I'll reiterate my position again, just so my side of the coin is represented.
While in concept, your position seems logical and fair - the problem is that the overarching CULTURE that football was king in Happy Valley, and was too big to fail and led to a string of bad decisions, failures to follow up, and downright criminal negligence. I'm not certain much of anything was done to de-emphasize the importance of football over kids being raped. Look at the idiot students who rioted, and the Joe-Bots still walk among us with their heads high. I just don't feel that a year or two of NCAA wrist-slapping and backpedaling is enough to correct the culture of a community that placed football on such a high pedestal that their decision-makers couldn't bear to allow it to fail. Current players and coaches were free to leave and play football elsewhere, so its not as if the sanctions forced them to be punished.
Station, we've butted heads on this topic before I believe - but I'll reiterate my position again, just so my side of the coin is represented.
While in concept, your position seems logical and fair - the problem is that the overarching CULTURE that football was king in Happy Valley, and was too big to fail and led to a string of bad decisions, failures to follow up, and downright criminal negligence. I'm not certain much of anything was done to de-emphasize the importance of football over kids being raped. Look at the idiot students who rioted, and the Joe-Bots still walk among us with their heads high. I just don't feel that a year or two of NCAA wrist-slapping and backpedaling is enough to correct the culture of a community that placed football on such a high pedestal that their decision-makers couldn't bear to allow it to fail. Current players and coaches were free to leave and play football elsewhere, so its not as if the sanctions forced them to be punished.
Because it could/will affect our bowl game this year.
I respect the present decision. Hard to call a $60 million fine, bowl ban, scholarship reductions and firing of the people in charge as a "wrist-slapping" GBG. That said everything else you said holds true. The e-mails show that most of the cover-up was due to how releasing the information would hurt the football program period. Pretty disingenuous to then listen to PSU fans whine about penalties that were directed at that program.
Wonder how many kids would have been saved if those SOBS had put doing the right thing above protecting Joe Pa and the Lions.
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>