Off-GridTNgopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,881
- Reaction score
- 1,513
- Points
- 113
I thought I saw something a few weeks back... Holy fuck was I wrong... Wtf... It's time to make the change...
Year 3 regular season in the books. 15-44. The improved year 3 included the most pathetic non-conference schedule in school history, one quad 1 win, 5-0 against weakling Wednesday teams and 4-11 against everyone else. And 1-4 finish. I'm afraid the above remains true.He will be fired by April 1, 2025. Every day that passes between the end of this season and that day with him as the coach is a wasted day.
We are not mediocre. We haven’t been for a few years. We suck and fewer and fewer people care every year. Apparently including the people at the U themselves.I was sick of this shit 2 years ago, I was sick of this shit 1 year ago and I'm sick of this shit now. This program is the epitome of abject mediocrity, and it feels like it's never going to change.
Year 3 regular season in the books. 15-44. The improved year 3 included the most pathetic non-conference schedule in school history, one quad 1 win, 5-0 against weakling Wednesday teams and 4-11 against everyone else. And 1-4 finish. I'm afraid the above remains true.
I was sick of this shit 2 years ago, I was sick of this shit 1 year ago and I'm sick of this shit now. This program is the epitome of abject mediocrity, and it feels like it's never going to change.
We are a smart head-coach hire away from success.We are not mediocre. We haven’t been for a few years. We suck and fewer and fewer people care every year. Apparently including the people at the U themselves.
We are a smart head-coach hire away from success.
Ben and Richard were too inexperienced and neither Dan nor Tubby saw meaningful Power 5 success after.What does this mean though?
Hot mid-major coach coming off a tournament run like Dan Monson?
Aging legend like Tubby Smith?
Young coach with a famous last name like Richard Pitino?
Former alum like Ben Johnson?
It's just basketball. There's no secret sauce, you put the basketball into the hoop more than the other team.
When you're mediocre to bad for a quarter of a century, you need to start looking at systemic issues beyond coaching.
Nah, it's just hiring a good coach. We haven't hired a good, young coach with a history of success since Haskins. Every coach since has been flawed in some way - flash-in-the-pan, old, never-was, and less-than-never-was.What does this mean though?
Hot mid-major coach coming off a tournament run like Dan Monson?
Aging legend like Tubby Smith?
Young coach with a famous last name like Richard Pitino?
Former alum like Ben Johnson?
It's just basketball. There's no secret sauce, you put the basketball into the hoop more than the other team.
When you're mediocre to bad for a quarter of a century, you need to start looking at systemic issues beyond coaching.
That’s where the systemic issues hold us back. Those types of coaches aren’t hired here for a number of reasons one of which includes our unwillingness to pay enough.Nah, it's just hiring a good coach. We haven't hired a good, young coach with a history of success since Haskins. Every coach since has been flawed in some way - flash-in-the-pan, old, never-was, and less-than-never-was.
It would be nice, for once, to hire a coach with a few years of success as a head coach, and who isn't in the AARP. Hopefully that happens in the next month, but I doubt it.
I would say they improved a lot but if they go sub .500 in the conference next year, he is gone.Year 3 regular season in the books. 15-44. The improved year 3 included the most pathetic non-conference schedule in school history, one quad 1 win, 5-0 against weakling Wednesday teams and 4-11 against everyone else. And 1-4 finish. I'm afraid the above remains true.
This is patently untrue. There were way better candidates who would've won here that are working elsewhere right now for significantly less than what the U pays Johnson.That’s where the systemic issues hold us back. Those types of coaches aren’t hired here for a number of reasons one of which includes our unwillingness to pay enough.
Nah. People try to make it more complicated than it is, which is the simple fact that we haven't made a good hire in 38 years.That’s where the systemic issues hold us back. Those types of coaches aren’t hired here for a number of reasons one of which includes our unwillingness to pay enough.
Yep, this year was good enough to earn year 4 but his seat should absolutely be warm heading into next season and team will almost certainly need to make the NCAA tournament next year for Johnson to not get fired.I would say they improved a lot but if they go sub .500 in the conference next year, he is gone.
Minny is a research university. These are all experiments in hiring.Nah. People try to make it more complicated than it is, which is the simple fact that we haven't made a good hire in 38 years.
9 wins are 9 wins but let's not pretend like 9 wins in an extremely down year with 7 of those wins against bottom to mid tier opponents is impressive.This is not the collapse you guys were looking for and Ben will be back next year. The average prediction here was 9 wins and he has met that. A run in the Big Ten tournament would be gravy. From here the trajectory looks good.
If you guys are serious about making it a better program then we should skip chatting about Ben and take the first (and most important step) of firing Coyle.
This is not the collapse you guys were looking for and Ben will be back next year. The average prediction here was 9 wins and he has met that. A run in the Big Ten tournament would be gravy. From here the trajectory looks good.
If you guys are serious about making it a better program then we should skip chatting about Ben and take the first (and most important step) of firing Coyle.
I'm not sure it will be a majority or "mass exodus" but I expect at least two starters, Fox and JOJ to leave. That alone will make significant improvement next year a reach without an unlikely HR in the portal.If the majority of the players enter the portal there is really no point in keeping him around if he can't even keep his guys this year.
I still honestly think he could be gone after this year if the following happens:vmultiple things can be true - or accurate - at the same time.
--The Gophers were better than last season.
--based on pre-season polls and predictions, the Gophers met most people's expectations or exceeded them.
--at times the Gophers played very well this season
--at other times, they played very poorly
--the team finished the season very poorly
in the end, you are what your record says you are - and the Gophers are the 10th-place team in a 14-team league.
I don't do predictions - but here's a prediction - Ben Johnson will be the head coach of the Gophers for 1 or 2 more seasons. barring some really significant accomplishments, he will either be let go after the '24-25 season or the '25-26 season.
and then the whole carousel starts all over again.
You get to include the preceding season when judging Coyle, not Ben. The trajectory with Coyle is horrible.Trajectory looks good? We're 3 years in and the program is no doubt in a worse place than when he took over. There are a ton of coaches at even the mid-major level that would be a significant upgrade.
You know if howeda expects it, it is bound to happen.I'm not sure it will be a majority or "mass exodus" but I expect at least two starters, Fox and JOJ to leave. That alone will make significant improvement next year a reach without an unlikely HR in the portal.
You get to include the preceding season when judging Coyle, not Ben. The trajectory with Coyle is horrible.
If we are judging Ben - he started with no players and no wins the start the trajectory is up.
I am not defending Ben here (mind you). Just saying that his trajectory is up over the course of 3 years. Saying anything less is just saying - Ben hurt my feelings, He should win more games, I hate Ben, we all need to be mean to Ben. Seriously, who has time for that.
First off to your last line....Northwestern is not a bad team. I get the perception of Northwestern in general but this is a team that beat both Purdue and Illinois this year and will get a double bye in the Big Ten Tournament. Disappointing game last night to be sure but have heard a few people act like losing to Northwestern is unacceptable like they are some garbage team and that simply is not the case.9 wins are 9 wins but let's not pretend like 9 wins in an extremely down year with 7 of those wins against bottom to mid tier opponents is impressive.
The goal here should always be to make the tournament, Ben and staff don't get a pass on 7 win improvement when they shouldn't have been that bad last year to begin with.
I agree he won't be fired, but disagree on the fact that he should be, we were blown out...by Northwestern- a sentence you would never hear under previous two regimes