No, he can't confirm or no, he's not going?
No, he can't confirm or no, he's not going?
No he can't confirm, so please go to our site and pay to read what we "know".No, he can't confirm or no, he's not going?
Got it. ThanksNo he can't confirm, so please go to our site and pay to read what we "know".
reached out to the football team? when did he do this? that would be awesome!!Just stop with the Tenn talk. Fleck is NOT going there 100%. He wants no part of the SEC unless it's one of the top 2 or 3 programs (TN ain't it); not to mention they will have NCAA sanctions going forward. He's already has reached out the team and said he's not going anywhere.
I hope you’re right but how do you know he’s told the team he’s staying?Just stop with the Tenn talk. Fleck is NOT going there 100%. He wants no part of the SEC unless it's one of the top 2 or 3 programs (TN ain't it); not to mention they will have NCAA sanctions going forward. He's already has reached out the team and said he's not going anywhere.
If it’s true that Fleck likes being the program builder, then this seems like the type of challenge he’d want. Needs major culture change, but large upside (won a natty about 20 years ago and access to SEC talent pool). Florida and Georgia are in no way unbeatable. And with sanctions I could see him being able to sell that as having “Year Zero” for like 3 years to protect himself from expectations. Taking over a much bigger program with recent sustained success like ND would come with expectations of a lot quicker success, and less personal glory for PJ.An interesting read on how the Vols got into their current predicament:
On the one hand, I can't see why Fleck would want to walk into such a dysfunctional mess. The potential for serious NCAA sanctions is real.
On the other hand, if the Vols administration views Fleck as their best hope for avoiding serious NCAA sanctions--and its serious about wresting control of the program back from the boosters--I can see why they'd be interested in Fleck and offer him whatever he wants in order to get him to take the job.
Just depends how slow of a news day it is.I don't like that the Pioneer Press Sport section has this as their headline. In the past, its been a side article for potential of PJ leaving.
An interesting read on how the Vols got into their current predicament:
On the one hand, I can't see why Fleck would want to walk into such a dysfunctional mess. The potential for serious NCAA sanctions is real.
On the other hand, if the Vols administration views Fleck as their best hope for avoiding serious NCAA sanctions--and its serious about wresting control of the program back from the boosters--I can see why they'd be interested in Fleck and offer him whatever he wants in order to get him to take the job.
“He’s already reached out to the team and said he’s not going anywhere” and you would know this how? Or is this what they call embellishment?Just stop with the Tenn talk. Fleck is NOT going there 100%. He wants no part of the SEC unless it's one of the top 2 or 3 programs (TN ain't it); not to mention they will have NCAA sanctions going forward. He's already has reached out the team and said he's not going anywhere.
He has made a total of 1 coaching move as a head coach - from WMU to the Gophers which was a huge step up from the MAC to the Big10 (very understandable). Assistants and coordinators commonly make changes from one program to the next if their goal is to be a head coach of a Power 5 school one day which is exactly what Fleck did.People keep asking "Why would Fleck leave MN?"
Well- just speculating here - but if Fleck has come to a private realization that winning at MN - at least winning big - is going to be more difficult than he thought, then he might have reason to consider other options.
And - FWIW - here is Fleck's list of coaching stops:
Northern Illinois - 3 years
Rutgers - 2 years
Tampa Bay Bucs - 1 year
Western Michigan - 4 years
Minnesota - 4 years to date
Fleck has never stayed at the same place longer than 4 years. Maybe MN is different, and he will stay here longer.
But, his track record so far has been to stay at one place for a relatively short time and then move on.
So, from that perspective, it would not be shocking if he might be willing to consider a change.
Fleck - at least in some circles - is seen as a "turnaround specialist" - a guy who comes into a job, brings fairly quick improvement, and then moves on to the next challenge. Tennessee presents a real challenge. Just saying.
Why will he take a job where the front office that may have back stabbers and snakes in the grass lurking? Then, how is he going to control the very secretive bag men and boosters?
Leadership come from the top. Do you want your AD to be a former head coach who is responsible for the demise of his predecessor? Will Fulmer micromanage him?
It is not only the coach that they have to fix. They need to change the culture of the Athletic Department which will be difficult.
R
you must have missed where Fulmer retired and they hired a AD Danny White last week from UCF.
Did his buyout drop from 10 million to 4 million this month ?Feels like it's becoming more and more likely Fleck is leaving with the news that keeps coming out. First Dan, now this article, etc. The fact that his name keeps appearing doesn't bode well either.
Whew!
Yes it did.Did his buyout drop from 10 million to 4 million this month ?
Thank you. Just curious. I do not think it makes a difference to those school super serious about football.Yes it did.