BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 61,980
- Reaction score
- 18,170
- Points
- 113
Gooo Wild!!
I don't live in the Cities, so I had never heard of Seth Kaplan. I assumed it was just some rube with a bunch of hot takes. It's shocking to me that this is an actual local sports writer.
Gooo Wild!!
I don't live in the Cities, so I had never heard of Seth Kaplan. I assumed it was just some rube with a bunch of hot takes. It's shocking to me that this is an actual local sports writer.
I don't pretend to be a hockey genius. But it sure seems as if the Wild is not the same team when Erickson Ek is out of the lineup. as someone said earlier, the Center position has been an issue for a while, and it's even bigger when Ek is out. Rossi needs to come through, or Guerin needs to find a top-line center by hook or by crook.
beyond that, I don't need to add to the special-teams discussion. it's pretty damn blatant even if you're not a hockey genius.
If Ek hit the open market today he gets paid a lot more than $5M. When your top center is Freddy Geaudreau, it’s hard for me to criticize the coaching staff much there.If there's that big a problem with Ek out of the lineup, that's not a glowing validation of the coaching staff. Eriksson Ek is a $5.25M mid-level player, not someone that the operation should massively struggle without. However....
Looking at Cap Friendly, the Wild are definitely not strong and deep at the moment at the Center position, where Ek plays. So certainly that makes his loss hurt more than your typical $5M player.
Dallas was just plain a tough draw, specifically with Oettinger in net. Right now, I think you could make an argument for him being the best goalie remaining in the postseason, or at least on the Western Conference side
With Ek out and Kx2 clearly not 100%, I think the writing is on the wall although I hope I'm wrong.
When you take into account that our roster is put together minus two (2) Max salary player slots (Suter & Parise), I wouldn't trade our coach or GM for any others.
I don't pretend to be a hockey genius. But it sure seems as if the Wild is not the same team when Erickson Ek is out of the lineup. as someone said earlier, the Center position has been an issue for a while, and it's even bigger when Ek is out. Rossi needs to come through, or Guerin needs to find a top-line center by hook or by crook.
beyond that, I don't need to add to the special-teams discussion. it's pretty damn blatant even if you're not a hockey genius.
Agreed. I'm not sure if Boldy and Gus will be up for significant raises next season but they will be soon enough.Well, Boldy played this year at $800k and Gustavsson played this year at $800k, and that ain't going to be the case next year.
BUT! They do lose that dumbf'k Dumba next year, and that bloated $6M salary so that will be some serious addition by subtraction that will help the ledger a little bit. They'll still have some difficult decisions to make though.
Agreed. I'm not sure if Boldy and Gus will be up for significant raises next season but they will be soon enough.
I didn't know that...thank goodness we dump Dumba's contract to help cover it.Boldy's is already negotiated, his $7M salary kicks in next year. Oooffff!!! But it sure looks like he's worth it.
I didn't know that...thank goodness we dump Dumba's contract to help cover it.
This is uncharacteristically careless and lazy analysis. Eriksson-Ek is arguably the most important player on the Wild.If there's that big a problem with Ek out of the lineup, that's not a glowing validation of the coaching staff. Eriksson Ek is a $5.25M mid-level player, not someone that the operation should massively struggle without. However....
In terms of goal accumulation and prevention combined...yes, I agree.This is uncharacteristically careless and lazy analysis. Eriksson-Ek is arguably the most important player on the Wild.
Right. He's our #1 face off guy, top penalty killer and stands in front of the net on the power play. Let's see, what has cost us massively in this series........?In terms of goal accumulation and prevention combined...yes, I agree.
Somehow they rose above the deflation of him hobbling off the ice after 19 seconds in Game 3 and reshuffled the lines for an entire contest, but not having him has been huge.
Right. He's our #1 face off guy, top penalty killer and stands in front of the net on the power play. Let's see, what has cost us massively in this series........?
You obviously don’t understand that +/- is only even strength. Matching up against the other team’s top line can lead to a few goals against. The opposing teams have good players too. Downplaying the 4th leading scorer for a team that has limited scoring depth seems shortsighted. Defense doesn’t show up on the stat sheet. And FO wins ahead of him on the team are sparsely used. There are only two forwards that average more TOI.Not really worth arguing about but the numbers just don't really match up with what you're saying. I counted eight (8) different Wild players that have a better (+/-) than Ek, five (5) with a better FO percentage, and he's their 4th leading scorer.
It's a big loss, no doubt about it, but it's late April in the NHL; nobody is playing at 100% health right now.
EE is our top penalty killer, in a landslide.The reality is, the combination of their absolutely abysmal (possibly historically so?) penalty kill
I’m not counting them out. Boldy and Kaprizov need to produce. And if Fleury gets the nod, he needs to play his very best.and running up against a goalie like Oettinger has been the difference. They could easily turn it around, I hope they do and at least push the Stars to the brink
Holy shit, this is bad.