dpodoll68
Elite Poster
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2008
- Messages
- 19,323
- Reaction score
- 971
- Points
- 113
I'll take the bait.
First of all..."good player" is still to be determined. Second of all, if you are going to quote me, please use my entire sentence to keep it in context. It's important. For example, if I take your quote as it is written, then I am to assume you believe that when the top player in the country commits to LSU that hurts Minnesota?
Now, back to Cornell and losing him to OSU...maybe I should expand and clarify my stance. We are talking about prospects here. Lets say Cornell committed to Alabama. OSU simply says, "next up?" and is still likely to land a highly recruited defensive end that may or may not turn out to be better than Cornell. That is my point. Because they land top recruits annually,whether it's Cornell or another top prospect has no immediate relevance to the success or failure of Minnesota. He may turn into a stud and sack Mitch Leidner 7 times in 1 game, or he might not. Same goes for all of their other top recruits. To say his commitment hurts Minnesota, is a little premature, and misguided. Either way, hindsight will be 20/20 and I'm sure you will remind me years from now if he blows up the Gopher O-Line and we lose by 40. However, keep in mind it's just as likely that he'll be a non factor in a game where their other 5 star recruits throws for 6 td's.
Recruiting battles between OSU and Alabama have little relevance to Minnesota. Recruiting battles between OSU and Minnesota have a lot of relevance to Minnesota. We're not talking about some random guy from Florida or Texas or wherever, we're talking about a guy who was born and raised and went to school and lived his entire life to this point a few minutes from Minnesota's campus. Of course it hurts Minnesota even more if he ends up being a good college player, but even if he doesn't, it hurts Minnesota because it continues the perception that we're not a school worthy to be attended by elite football prospects. I didn't realize that this was a controversial opinion to hold. Then again, I've never seen anyone try to make the argument (with a straight face, apparently) that elite in-state football players going to other schools is somehow not harmful to the U.