Spaulding!No!
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Messages
- 11,338
- Reaction score
- 6,483
- Points
- 113
It appears at this juncture your ox got gored.Seek help before u end up babbling tile PA the rest of your life
It appears at this juncture your ox got gored.Seek help before u end up babbling tile PA the rest of your life
This team isn't winning the Super Bowl. And they probably aren't winning the divisional round regardless of who/where they play. Losing in the first round makes the "they were frauds!" narrative stick. Winning at least one game makes it a successful season IMO. Then fire Donatell, cut several of the old, aging, expensive players and fix the defense.Many of you are treating round 1 like a bowl game. "I'm glad we got the 3 seed so we can play the giants." WTF?
You want as many home games as possible because the point is to get to the Super bowl, not win a game in the wild card round.
You think Purdy is going to play as good at US Bank against a fired up crowd as he would in Santa Clara? No way.
I'm not sure I'd go that far, but I do think the "Packers are back!" narrative is overstated. The great winning streak has been over the Bears, Rams, a Dolphins team in full collapse mode and yesterday's debacle.The 49ers will kill the packers
Strategery.Yikes.
I think the Lions will give the Packers everything they want.The 49ers will kill the packers
Vikings were terrible and shot themselves in foot. Packers havent impressed yet and lions are going to give them a good game. You can just never underestimate the ability of the lions to F upI think the Lions will give the Packers everything they want.
Did he want the Viking job but the feeling wasn't mutual?
We'll find a way to beat Green Bay at home.This team isn't winning the Super Bowl. And they probably aren't winning the divisional round regardless of who/where they play. Losing in the first round makes the "they were frauds!" narrative stick. Winning at least one game makes it a successful season IMO. Then fire Donatell, cut several of the old, aging, expensive players and fix the defense.
Is that the play where we only had 10 defenders? Maybe just trying to do something?Yikes.
You want them to.I think the Lions will give the Packers everything they want.
I think he came here expecting to be offered the job on a platter, maybe even begging on their knees.Did he want the Viking job but the feeling wasn't mutual?
Well ya, if the packers get a defensive td, a kickoff td, 4 turnovers, see the niners miss two field goals and see two starting o-lineman go down right away.........I would love the packers chances against the niners.You want them to.
Will be an interesting test. If the Packers do like they did against us this coming weekend, then they'll beat SF in the first round. Bank it
There is now basically no chance we will play GB. The only way would be in the NFC Championship game. In that case, bring it on.We'll find a way to beat Green Bay at home.
We'll lose out in SF.
But I think folks like Barreiro who hand-waive "oh Green Bay will get killed out in San Fran" like he said today, are full of BS. Hopefully, we'll see.
It sounds like he wanted it and Kwesi wanted him but got over-ruled by the rest of the "committee". Hard to argue with the results. I think he'd have had similar results this year, but O'Connell is a better long-term fit. Harbaugh will last 3-4 years wherever he goes and then burn-out and/or retire.Did he want the Viking job but the feeling wasn't mutual?
To be fair, you don't bring in someone like Jim Harbaugh unless it's basically a done deal before he arrives. I don't think his expectation that the in-person interview was a formality was out of line.I think he came here expecting to be offered the job on a platter, maybe even begging on their knees.
When they "only" interviewed him like a serious candidate, but among the rest of the serious candidates, he was like "oh ..... hmmm well maybe I'll just crawl back to Michigan".
No that was a different one. I remember it being 3rd and 10 on that play.Is that the play where we only had 10 defenders? Maybe just trying to do something?
This is why I’ve never been a fan of the 3-4. I suppose it makes a difference on your personnel. If Khalil Mack or Von Miller is out there I feel a bit better, but still not ideal. Hunter is a prototypical 4-3 DE. Square peg, round hole. If the 3-4 stays, Hunter shouldn’t be back.Yikes.
It makes little sense with our personnel.This is why I’ve never been a fan of the 3-4. I suppose it makes a difference on your personnel. If Khalil Mack or Von Miller is out there I feel a bit better, but still not ideal. Hunter is a prototypical 4-3 DE. Square peg, round hole. If the 3-4 stays, Hunter shouldn’t be back.
Bolded: why? No one had to blow up that he was coming here. He and his agent probably did that themselves.To be fair, you don't bring in someone like Jim Harbaugh unless it's basically a done deal before he arrives. I don't think his expectation that the in-person interview was a formality was out of line.
How do you figure this?There is now basically no chance we will play GB. The only way would be in the NFC Championship game. In that case, bring it on.
Philly plays the lowest remaining seed. If Green Bay wins, they play Philly.How do you figure this?
I see it as:
- Vikings #3 beat Giants #6
- Packers #7 beat SF #2
- Dallas #5 beats Brady #4
So second round is #1 Philly vs #5 Dallas and #3 Vikings vs #7 Packers. Where did I go wrong?
Because he already had a job, and a college job at that. It's a huge risk to the recruiting class etc. if you openly interview for another job. And he's a proven NFL coach. He wouldn't have interviewed in person if he was "just another candidate."Bolded: why? No one had to blow up that he was coming here. He and his agent probably did that themselves.
Would guess the Vikings tried to make it clear from the git-go that it was not a done deal.
Oh, well that would be where I get it wrong. I thought it was locked in brackets.Philly plays the lowest remaining seed. If Green Bay wins, they play Philly.
It's still his fault. As I said, no one had to know that he came here to interview.Because he already had a job, and a college job at that. It's a huge risk to the recruiting class etc. if you openly interview for another job. And he's a proven NFL coach. He wouldn't have interviewed in person if he was "just another candidate."
Anything to help the precious Packers.This is ridiculous. Isn’t it the point to avoid these situations?