Spaulding!No!
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Messages
- 11,338
- Reaction score
- 6,481
- Points
- 113
Viking trouble chat < Rodgers chat
Who knows? I don’t think the two situations are that comparable as Rice’s case was pretty straightforward. Cook’s seems like both parties were aggressors at times. I guess we will see as we got more information.Is Dalvin's career cooked just like Ray Rice?
If the two other witnesses part of Dalvin's lawyers statement is accurate it's more than just a he said she said.Who knows? I don’t think the two situations are that comparable as Rice’s case was pretty straightforward. Cook’s seems like both parties were aggressors at times. I guess we will see as we got more information.
Yep, it’s been reported that it was Dozier and he is in the hospital in stable condition.
Hope he's OK. And 29 contact tracing. Yikes. You wonder if a forfeit is on the horizon? We have a lot of key unvaxed players too (Smith is already out, Cousins, Cook etc.)Yep, it’s been reported that it was Dozier and he is in the hospital in stable condition.
Hard to say, I guess it will depend if there is an outbreak or not. If there is, then the Vikings will have an even worse chance at winning the next couple games.Hope he's OK. And 29 contact tracing. Yikes. You wonder if a forfeit is on the horizon? We have a lot of key unvaxed players too (Smith is already out, Cousins, Cook etc.)
Well, I guess it's a damn good thing a massive effort was made to make every NFL player get the jab when numerous NFL players that were vaxed continue to test positive. Makes complete sense, no doubt.
Makes complete sense to most people. Not sure what your hang up is.Well, I guess it's a damn good thing a massive effort was made to make every NFL player get the jab when numerous NFL players that were vaxed continue to test positive. Makes complete sense, no doubt.
The protocols really don't make sense, nor are they backed by the data or Science if you're actually looking at it. Unvaccinated players are seemingly fine with few to no symptoms, but can't play because a test told them they can't.Makes complete sense to most people. Not sure what your hang up is.
Are you telling me that you have more savvy and time than a billion dollar organization with an army of doctors and data scientists?backed by the data or Science if you're actually looking at it.
Are you telling me that you have more savvy and time than a billion dollar organization with an army of doctors and data scientists?
Of course they knew. Just a continuation of the charade by all parties involved. But hey, science...The data is what it is. The NFL's protocols, and many of the interventions that have been implemented nation wide, are more for show than about data or Science.
The Packers and the NFL knew for a long time what was going on with Rodgers. There's a reason they ignored it until they couldn't anymore.
I guess we disagree on what the data is.The data is what it is.
"Well I guess it's a damn good thing that the NFL punishes players when they get DUI, since we just had a guy kill someone while wasted behind the wheel. Makes complete sense, no doubt."Well, I guess it's a damn good thing a massive effort was made to make every NFL player get the jab when numerous NFL players that were vaxed continue to test positive. Makes complete sense, no doubt.
He's been lying about what "the data" says, from day one.I guess we disagree on what the data is.
Asking for a friend:If the two other witnesses part of Dalvin's lawyers statement is accurate it's more than just a he said she said.
There’s no disagreeing on dataI guess we disagree on what the data is.
I'm sorry. But that shows a critical misunderstanding of data. There are many facets to slicing and dicing multiple vectors and data points. Too often, I see people point at simple vanity metrics as proof of anything.There’s no disagreeing on data
So far, the NFL has said this is a civil matter, not criminal and they aren't doing anything. I suppose if very ugly details come out and are confirmed they will backtrack faster than Breeland.Asking for a friend:
there are no criminal charges here, right, just civil, so my question is, if Cook loses in court (or more likely settles with NDA), does he get off "scot free" from the League's/Viking's sense?
IE, if he were convicted of a crime, he'd be toast -- and then we wouldn't have to pay out his contract, and it wouldn't count against the cap anymore, right?
But that can't be the case here, with just civil?
This is a really unusual situation, from everything I've heard. The girlfriend pictures aren't good, but it sure sounds like she was the antagonizer in this case, at least to some degree.So far, the NFL has said this is a civil matter, not criminal and they aren't doing anything. I suppose if very ugly details come out and are confirmed they will backtrack faster than Breeland.
I'm sorry. But that shows a critical misunderstanding of data. There are many facets to slicing and dicing multiple vectors and data points. Too often, I see people point at simple vanity metrics as proof of anything.
People with no background in data pay no mind to data governance, including lineage and provenance.
The raw data is a small piece of the puzzle. And it's easy to get fooled.
That's good to hear. I suppose the difference then between us is who you trust. I trust the majority of health professionals and data analysts that have found the vaccine effective in a variety of ways.Not the data I'm talking about. People misunderstanding the data is exactly why the handling of COVID continues at an absurd and non-Scientific path.
Luckily I do have an extensive background in data analysis and I'm not easily fooled.
I haven't paid much attention to the case, so I may have missed something. But did she go to the police originally? Was a report filed, and the DA just chose not to pursue charges based on the evidence? Or is she coming for him after the fact looking for a payday (because this is a civil case)?This is a really unusual situation, from everything I've heard. The girlfriend pictures aren't good, but it sure sounds like she was the antagonizer in this case, at least to some degree.
At the very least, it sounds like they are correct in moving forward, business as usual, and letting things play out for now.
Sooooo .... you're saying something like "backtrack one of the slowest of the starting CB's in the league and do terribly at it"?they will backtrack faster than Breeland.
Like GWG.People with no background in data