All About Daniel House

Donate To GopherHole
hungan1

hungan1

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
14,194
Reaction score
4,258
Points
113
Daniel House's interest in journalism and sports started early in high school. He has given us exceptional stories and analyses of Gopher Football. Kudos to Daniel House on a great career!

www.danielwhouse.com

Daniel House

Daniel House is a well known sports journalist who covers the Minnesota Vikings and Minnesota Gophers.
www.danielwhouse.com www.danielwhouse.com
 




Word said:
He seems hard working and dedicated to his craft. That puts him ahead of about 99% of sports journalists in the Twin Cities.
Click to expand...
Amen.

Frustrating to see how many sports media folks all just join the "being an asshole" train as their "personality".

Wolves win to get into the playoffs and out of nowhere I get tweets from other local sports guys pissing on them. I don't get it. Why be an asshole about other folks celerating? It's sad.
 



Word said:
He seems hard working and dedicated to his craft. That puts him ahead of about 99% of sports journalists in the Twin Cities.
Click to expand...
Not just in the Twin Cities....there are a lot of hacks out there in the sports journalism space just tossing crap against the wall to see what sticks.

House on the other hand comes across someone that actually knows what he is talking about and takes the time to make sure there is substance to go along with his information.

He won't be long for this region if he keeps that up.
 

MNVCGUY said:
Not just in the Twin Cities....there are a lot of hacks out there in the sports journalism space just tossing crap against the wall to see what sticks.
Click to expand...
Telling people what they want to hear, is a good way to get clicks.

🤷
 

A_Slab_of_Bacon said:
I don't get it. Why be an asshole about other folks celerating? It's sad.
Click to expand...
Because it's easy, and lazy.

It really is easier just to be negative. You don't have to "prove" why you're negative, it just really easy to find something negative.
 




Twitter/Facebook/social media/internet gave a platform ... to anyone. Literally anyone who thinks anything.

In the olden days, you used to have to (be able to) say things that a decent amount of folks thought were reasonable, to earn the privilege to have a platform in the first place. It was expensive to provide that kind of platform, so only those few folks earned that right.


Now, you basically have to say outlandish things, to get attention for yourself, or you just get lost in the mix.

Race to the bottom.
 

A_Slab_of_Bacon said:
It is easy, but it also gets eyeballs.

Sadly I "blame" twitter where being an asshole is rewarded.
Click to expand...
But anyway....to my original comment, I hope Daniel gets rewarded with a good, decent-paying gig somewhere. He will do well for that publication.
 

Gophers_4life said:
Twitter/Facebook/social media/internet gave a platform ... to anyone. Literally anyone who thinks anything.

In the olden days, you used to have to (be able to) say things that a decent amount of folks thought were reasonable, to earn the privilege to have a platform in the first place. It was expensive to provide that kind of platform, so only those few folks earned that right.


Now, you basically have to say outlandish things, to get attention for yourself, or you just get lost in the mix.

Race to the bottom.
Click to expand...
Not only that, but so much of "reporting" now is based on being first as opposed to being right.
 




Gophers_4life said:
Twitter/Facebook/social media/internet gave a platform ... to anyone. Literally anyone who thinks anything.

In the olden days, you used to have to (be able to) say things that a decent amount of folks thought were reasonable, to earn the privilege to have a platform in the first place. It was expensive to provide that kind of platform, so only those few folks earned that right.


Now, you basically have to say outlandish things, to get attention for yourself, or you just get lost in the mix.

Race to the bottom.
Click to expand...
While I mostly agree - it also gave an opportunity to some industrious people to carve a niche that they could parlay into bigger things. See Seth Stohs, Aaron Gleeman, Arif Hassan and soon hopefully Daniel.
 

PhillyGopher said:
While I mostly agree - it also gave an opportunity to some industrious people to carve a niche that they could parlay into bigger things. See Seth Stohs, Aaron Gleeman, Arif Hassan and soon hopefully Daniel.
Click to expand...
Right you are, and deservedly so.

I wish there was some way to have a middle ground. These days, "what's that?"
 


60's Guy said:
ESPN needs a Vikings writer. The Athletic could use more coverage on the Gophers.
Click to expand...
I don't think the Gophers coverage is profitable enough to add someone to that. There just isn't a huge market for Gophers news.
 

Unregistered User said:
Because it's easy, and lazy.

It really is easier just to be negative. You don't have to "prove" why you're negative, it just really easy to find something negative.
Click to expand...
Works well here on GopherHole. Take a look at the Reaction scores per number of messages of a very objective poster like Bleed Gopher and compare that to some of the.. ahem... less agreeable and more argumentative sorts. One gets rewarded by being controversial.

Social media evens the playing field by providing equal voice but it can also be a cesspool where people can spew without consequence.
 





Dakota2 said:
NYT bought Athletic. They are aggressively cutting back on team coverage.
Click to expand...

Says who? My friend is an NFL writer on the staff and didn't relay anything about that after the acquisition. He said they felt bullish on what that Times money will allow them to do.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom