stocker08
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
- Messages
- 41,032
- Reaction score
- 26,250
- Points
- 113
I agree that the games themselves aren’t that different, but I strongly disagree that it doesn’t matter. In terms of TV exposure, “brand” and quality of the opponent, and likelihood of fans traveling, Phoenix is FAR worse than Vegas or Nashville. Playing on 12/30 or NYE against Utah, LSU, or Tennessee would draw a ton more eyeballs and traveling fans than 12/26 against Cincinnati. Who knows if it makes any difference at all in the long run, but I don’t think anyone can argue that Vegas and Nashville are far, far desirable locations.
EDIT to say I’m starting to think PJ and Coyle either don’t care or they actively lobby to end up in these lower bowls against worse opponents for a better chance to win the games. I think they’re the only 8-4 teams in history to play in the Rate and Pinstripe?
I've also had a suspicion that Fleck may not care much because a lower ranked bowl means a better chance to win and extend the bowl streak. Otherwise.....you'd think that him and Coyle would be able to lobby the conference for support on a better game/opponent every once in a while.....seeing as how we've ended up at the Rate Bowl and Pinstripe with 8-4 records despite the fact that no other Big Ten team has ever been placed in either of those bowls with an eight win season.