gopherhoopsguy
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,177
- Reaction score
- 22
- Points
- 38
So with adding 2 more teams to the Big Ten means more espn3 or watching more games online? That would really suck! They need to come up with better plan.
So with adding 2 more teams to the Big Ten means more espn3 or watching more games online? That would really suck! They need to come up with better plan.
So with adding 2 more teams to the Big Ten means more espn3 or watching more games online? That would really suck! They need to come up with better plan.
I think the upshot is that BTN will benefit the most with more content to air. There might be like 4 games total in the conference that would have been on ESPN or ESPN2, but expansion drove to ESPNU or ESPN3. B1G is adding two teams, 18 games extra for each team in conference play. That's an increase of 36 conference games, most of which will go on BTN.
Actually adding 2 Big 10 teams results in an increase of 18 games total.
12 teams = 108 Conf games
14 teams= 126 Conf games
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>ACC-Big Ten Challenge matchups will be released at 4 pm. Full coverage on <a href="http://t.co/HI6EGZd2g3">http://t.co/HI6EGZd2g3</a>.</p>— Andy Katz (@ESPNAndyKatz) <a href="https://twitter.com/ESPNAndyKatz/statuses/461903165156491264">May 1, 2014</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Told no real surprises as <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Gophers&src=hash">#Gophers</a> hoops is finalizing their non-conf. schedule. Iowa St. wants to start a series. Will happen. Not now.</p>— Darren Wolfson (@DarrenWolfson) <a href="https://twitter.com/DarrenWolfson/statuses/462681992367063040">May 3, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
No thanks. There are plenty of decent BCS programs we could play who don't have recruiting aspirations and connections to Minnesota's backyard, and right now this matchup would do more for ISU than for us.
I would think we'd be looking more at playing Northeast schools.
No thanks. There are plenty of decent BCS programs we could play who don't have recruiting aspirations and connections to Minnesota's backyard, and right now this matchup would do more for ISU than for us.
I would think we'd be looking more at playing Northeast schools.
Amelia (if you're reading this thread by chance), has Pitino mentioned anything about a home and home? A bunch of guarantee games is a given every season, so that's not a surprise.
Found a couple more, added above.
OSU to host UMass-Lowell, Rutgers to host New Hampshire on Dec. 9.
Matta really knows how to start a season with a bust.
I think it is highly doubtful that Louisiana Tech, NM State, San Francisco or Tulsa would play a buy game at Minnesota. Those others I could see going for that potentially, but I believe teams from the leagues of the 4 teams I mentioned practically never schedule buy games on the road at power conference teams.
Michigan will host SMU on Dec. 20. Also, Oakland head coach Greg Kampe tweeted that they are scheduled to play at Maryland on Dec. 27.
Minnesota will host UNC-Wilmington on December 27th.
http://www.starnewsonline.com/artic...esota-on-UNCW-basketball-schedule-for-2014-15