Search results

And that's what the best ones will do, they'll sign in a different conference. And then it'll just be analogous to before NIL: Before NIL: B1G schools make you go to class and SEC doesn't. After NIL: B1G schools make you be a part of CBA, SEC doesn't. Now they get their advantage again.

But then who goes first? Like, why would the B1G athletes want to lock themselves into "restrictions" while the SEC sits idle and lets their athletes continue with unlimited restrictions? And what would the motivation be for the SEC to try, now that they have a recruiting advantage over the B1G?

Who would the players be "bargaining" against? Any answer you provide will be easily explained away as "not happening", but alas, I'm sure you'll try anyways.

Can you explain more? If there are better schedules, doesn't that muddy the waters? I guess what I mean is, when these conferences last expanded people on here were talking that top teams were gonna have to get used to more losses because now Texas and Oklahoma are in the SEC waters, Oregon...

Yeah, you have all teams agreeing to not try and do what Miami is doing to Duke.

While technically true, if you compare where he went to high school to where he'll be playing next year, most people wouldn't feel like they're in the same state. I mean, this was the description of one of the events before one of their home games last year: Not much in common with the...

Didn't know that, thanks. Maybe it's just me, but Senior Female would come off better. Senior Woman just came off as old fashioned and rude, and I think that's why I thought it was a mistake.

I gotta agree. From 2025 and 2026 on the list you have, I only recognized one name, and that's because the guy went to Michigan and people kept mentioning his $12M or whatever. I used to follow high school recruiting way more and I knew the top players at almost all positions. Your post made...

I gotta admit, when I read the first two titles I assumed the author screwed up, but then there's that third title. It exists.

Yeah, I bet the thought process went about like this, "lemme think of another team that hasn't had a lot of success and had plenty of down years like Indiana", then he identifies us and thinks, "well, QB is the most important position on the field so if they get one they can turn things around"...

Was just gonna post the exact same thing.

Not sure I've ever heard the title "Senior Woman Administrator". I think I know what he meant, but man.... That being said, the article makes the home games seem like a real cool experience.

Redshirt freshman. Glad he found a spot!

Either way, QB isn't the limiting factor like ol' Bundy claimed. None of the Heisman finalists would have gotten us to the CFP with our offensive line, WRs, etc.

If not for that performance in Seattle, this would have a great chance of being spot on!

I kinda agree, especially when you see what happened to Jackson Kollack. Pretty much a year prior he was a highly regarded recruit with multiple options. One year on the bench and he might not have a good offer to play somewhere.

"4 touch downs in one game" - perfect line for the character.

While I appreciate any respect our team gets, the bolded makes me think the author isn't paying much attention to us. I think it's obvious our right side of the offensive line, WRs, and maybe DTs/CBs are the positions we'd need elite play from, not QB.

It would be cool to see Georgia become the second best college team in the state. Georgia Tech has been up and coming recently....

Probably has a hundred times more to do with their success than a few previously unheralded players.