The additional revenue was there with the Viking situation.

The members waffled on the stadium you said it yourself.

The stadium should be a non-issue. It is certainly not important compared to other things they have to deal with. Any voter who votes based on stadiums is a really blind voter IMO


I don't think they should have gouged either. I was responding to a person who said gouging could have resulted in the Vikings moving (rodentrampage) by saying if the gophers controlled the Vikings moving, they should have sent the Vikings on their way. I don't think they had that much control.
 

The members waffled on the stadium you said it yourself.

The stadium should be a non-issue. It is certainly not important compared to other things they have to deal with. Any voter who votes based on stadiums is a really blind voter IMO


I don't think they should have gouged either. I was responding to a person who said gouging could have resulted in the Vikings moving (rodentrampage) by saying if the gophers controlled the Vikings moving, they should have sent the Vikings on their way. I don't think they had that much control.
The Supreme Court established the limited antitrust exemption for professional sports which is the entire reason stadiums are publicly funded nationwide. The state of Minnesota wanted to keep the Vikings, their support is overwhelming, and chose to partially fund the stadium to keep them here rather than lose them to viable alternative markets.
 

The Supreme Court established the limited antitrust exemption for professional sports which is the entire reason stadiums are publicly funded nationwide. The state of Minnesota wanted to keep the Vikings, their support is overwhelming, and chose to partially fund the stadium to keep them here rather than lose them to viable alternative markets.

No kidding?
 

Gophers having a good relationship with the Vikings is desirable for the program. Don't get upset because the Vikings are the most popular girl at the ball in this town.
 

Gophers having a good relationship with the Vikings is desirable for the program. Don't get upset because the Vikings are the most popular girl at the ball in this town.

I agree with you.

But if the gophers had the power to make the Vikings leave (as was suggested in the post I responded to) you don't think they would be intelligent to try to make it happen?
 


I agree with you.

But if the gophers had the power to make the Vikings leave (as was suggested in the post I responded to) you don't think they would be intelligent to try to make it happen?
No I do not. Horrible PR move if it came out that the intent was to force the Vikings to leave, hurts the prestige of the entire metro area you are recruiting to, having an NFL team next door is one of the things the staff can use to differentiate Minnesota from the rest of the B1G.
 


No I do not. Horrible PR move if it came out that the intent was to force the Vikings to leave, hurts the prestige of the entire metro area you are recruiting to, having an NFL team next door is one of the things the staff can use to differentiate Minnesota from the rest of the B1G.

In this entirely fictional what if, I would think driving out your most similar competitor > recruit pitch
 

In this entirely fictional what if, I would think driving out your most similar competitor > recruit pitch
Not if you're the reason they were driven out, media would crucify the Gophers. NFL being in this town is good for the city, good for the Gophers.
 



I am going to disagree when you say the Vikings are good for the gophers.

But I'm going to be done talking about this hypothetical posed by gopher rodent now
 

We agree to disagree.

The Vikings could just as well played at the Metrodome until their stadium was being built somewhere else. He'll they could have played in Madison and people would have showed up from Minnesota.
 




Top Bottom