I see the delusion is already out on GPL about how good Hendricks is
"2nd pair on a 1-2 seed. 1st pair on a 3-4 seed"
He is a number four D on a contender and middle pair on any tournament team. Good lord. He and Whipple can be the middle pair.
To be really clear, I don’t watch enough SCSU hockey to weigh in, but I’m going to assume you probably didn’t watch every one of his games this year and are basing it off his draft status and pedigree.
Listing players by minutes and production, UND is the only one with a high draft choice playing bigger minutes, but their undrafted guy is the one stirring the drink.
Mich: Robertson is undrafted, Duke is undrafted, Fantilli undrafted, Rheume Mullen undrafted, Barnett is a 5th
DU: pohlkamp is a 5th rounder and Buckberger undrafted
Wisc: dexheimer is undrafted, Osborn a 4th
UND: livanavage is undrafted, wiebe a 7th, zmolek undrafted. Emery is a high draft choice an playing in a shutdown role as needed. Verhoeff is getting sheltered minutes. Liv is playing like 5-7 min more than the rest now.
Stop with this messaging. We absolutely need to improve the whole d core. He’s a solid add and if you skated 6 guys like him and Whipple, you’d be fine provided you find 1 who can add on the PP somewhere (Whipple joining the rush more was a very pleasant surprise throughout the year). Based on his scouting profile and those who watched him play way more than I, he’s a solid add preferably on the middle pair as he’s only going to be 20