Gopher_In_NYC
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Messages
- 23,942
- Reaction score
- 16,654
- Points
- 113
Jets Jets JetsJets still have 0 interceptions. Amazing.
Sux Sux Sux
Always Always Always
Jets Jets JetsJets still have 0 interceptions. Amazing.
bringing him back is probably the largest first decision they need to make as it massively retools the types of players you need to have if you switch to someone who does not blitz/scheme this wayAlec Lewis’ column today addresses Flo’s future.
![]()
Will Brian Flores be back as Vikings’ DC in 2026? Why it’s such a critical question
Flores' defense has been one of the league's best units in the second half of the season. But can the Vikings keep him around in 2026?www.nytimes.com
Here’s a taste -
This takes time to learn and grow, which may factor into Flores’ eventual decision. There are plenty of other elements at play, too. Flores’ racial discrimination suit against the NFL is ongoing. Owners and teams must also consider the previous comments made by Dolphins quarterback Tua Tagovailoa about Flores’ leadership style.
In Minnesota, Flores’ intensity has been evident since training camp began. The players have raved about his style. Smith’s decision to return and play his 14th season in 2025 hinged largely on Flores remaining in his role.
If Flores doesn’t receive a head coaching opportunity, would another organization be willing to offer him the same level of decision-making on offseason personnel? It’s one of the many relevant questions surrounding one of the bigger offseason topics for the Vikings.
The 49ers and Bears combined for 58 first downs tonight. The NFL record is 62.
A very entertaining football contest.
guess i didn't see the argument, but Ben Johnson calling a lateral play in the middle of the field with no timeouts left when you could've had at least 2-3 shots into the end zone before calling that is sure a choice (Maybe the call is for Swift to beeline to the sidelines if its not there?). The complete lack of urgency from guys to get set was also painful after that play as if they get set faster, you probably can try run a fade first before that last play to at least give you a second stab at itSorry, had to laugh. Plenty of stuff like this on X this morning
When did he try to leave before?bringing him back is probably the largest first decision they need to make as it massively retools the types of players you need to have if you switch to someone who does not blitz/scheme this way
I think Flores will try his best to leave again
I don’t think he gets hired or even interviewed for A HC job, as his contention in the lawsuit, is that the interviews he received previously were sham interviews, to fulfill the Rooney Rule requirements; there are plenty of other candidates out there.and seems like there will be ample vacancies to try do so without as many options to hire where last cycle had multiple guys who were "darling" type picks. Not quite so much this year and think he'll be listed as one of the top candidates at multiple jobs. Just a matter of if he wants a certain amount of personnel decision making capacity and if GMs are willing to give him that with some of his history and if owners are willing to hire a guy who's sued
I haven’t been able to watch live NFL until these last two weeks and the most remarkable discovery has been Purdy’s development into dare I say, elite quarterback status. Turns out he’s been 25 years old most of the seasonBrock Purdy, at least to me, is arguably the most criminally underrated (and probably disrespected) player in the NFL. The way he runs Shanahan's offense with surgical precision, throwing the ball from the pocket, downfield, not dump-offs left and right... just a very impressive player.
Gotta believe Run CMC locked up the Comeback Player of the Year with his performance last night, although I think he had it locked up already. Sucks, a little, because I sprinkled a little last fall on Trevor Lawrence, thinking/hoping Liam Coen would give some life to him and get the best out of him. Lawrence has been pretty good, but he won't beat CMC for the award.
I haven’t been able to watch live NFL until these last two weeks and the most remarkable discovery has been Purdy’s development into dare I say, elite quarterback status. Turns out he’s been 25 years old most of the season(turned 26 on Saturday)
I haven’t been able to watch live NFL until these last two weeks and the most remarkable discovery has been Purdy’s development into dare I say, elite quarterback status.
Thanks for the chuckle - well playedTurns out he’s been 25 years old most of the season(turned 26 on Saturday)
he has said numerous times on record he wants to be a HC again and your second part is the only reason he hasn't yet (and is why he didn't sign an extension last year despite the Vikings wanting him to).When did he try to leave before?
I don’t think he gets hired or even interviewed for A HC job, as his contention in the lawsuit, is that the interviews he received previously were sham interviews, to fulfill the Rooney Rule requirements; there are plenty of other candidates out there.
If I’m a team, there’s no way I touch him/that situation.
If I’m him, I wait until the suit is decided, as that may give me more leverage for future HC vacancies. There’s also the possibility the NFL settles to avoid the publicity and the discovery phase.
he has said numerous times on record he wants to be a HC again and your second part is the only reason he hasn't yet (and is why he didn't sign an extension last year despite the Vikings wanting him to).
Could absolutely see him end up in Cinci (who clearly doesn't care about anything) or Cleveland as they may view him and the defensive players they have as a good fit.
I agree with many in that there's no way he's going for another DC role. The NFL is weird in that it all ends up retreading guys. Eventually the inertia gets large enough that someone will give him a chance.
I agree he does have more leverage if he waits for the case to play out. Maybe they'll forever black ball him, but he wasn't fired for performance but for all the stuff with Ross (tampering, pressuring to lose games) which probably has a large degree of truth (as i'm sure all these owners are pushing towards as they just want to win and don't care how they get there).
Thanks for clarifying.he has said numerous times on record he wants to be a HC again and your second part is the only reason he hasn't yet (and is why he didn't sign an extension last year despite the Vikings wanting him to).
Their O is temptingCould absolutely see him end up in Cinci
Dysfunctional franchise.(who clearly doesn't care about anything) or Cleveland as they may view him and the defensive players they have as a good fit.
If I’m the Vikes, I make him the highest paid coordinator in football.I agree with many in that there's no way he's going for another DC role. The NFL is weird in that it all ends up retreading guys. Eventually the inertia gets large enough that someone will give him a chance.
I agree he does have more leverage if he waits for the case to play out. Maybe they'll forever black ball him, but he wasn't fired for performance but for all the stuff with Ross (tampering, pressuring to lose games) which probably has a large degree of truth (as i'm sure all these owners are pushing towards as they just want to win and don't care how they get there).
Given he’s a premier coordinator and hasn’t been interviewed since, just using it as a general term as owners clearly have overlooked numerous other guys with indiscretion/personnel issues in the past and if it was just that he was bad on personnel, then wtf are we doing in MN employing him?Sorry, but the notion that Flores has been "black-balled" by the NFL for getting another HC job is just plain ridiculous. His tenure in Miami, despite the record, was just not a very positive experience for anyone involved. It was littered with terrible stories regarding personnel/staff treatment.
I hire people at my company, and I can tell you there is a less than ZERO chance I would ever hire someone that has a history not only of mistreating subordinates, but also one of suing a former employer. Is that "black-balling"? Of course not. It's reality. Why would anyone EVER want to bring that into their building?
Black-balling directly implies that there was a directive issued by the NFL league office to not hire this person. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
To me, the interviews would be everything. I would want to hear what he has to say about what he learned during his time in Miami. I would want to hear personal accountability, I would want to hear some contrition, and most importantly I would want to hear a clear and concise plan about the future of the franchise, potential OC/DC decisions, etc.
I just don't see it though. There are always going to be too many other good choices out there to risk giving him the keys to your multi-billion dollar company. There's nothing wrong with being one of the elite DC's in the league, one of the most respected DC's in football and making $4-$5M/year without the headaches of the HC job.
He’s the reason Harry came back this year, per Lewis, FWIWGiven he’s a premier coordinator and hasn’t been interviewed since, just using it as a general term as owners clearly have overlooked numerous other guys with indiscretion/personnel issues in the past and if it was just that he was bad on personnel, then wtf are we doing in MN employing him?
Is just interesting he has remained without an interview. I don’t blame owners, but if we’re just rolling resumes out there, his is absolutely in the mix/getting interviews if you detach the lawsuit and the personnel stuff clearly vikes players love him (see Murphy comments recently for example)
they seem like they have a super cool relationship with calling multiple plays and being able to audible on the field. defensively seems like a super fun system to play inHe’s the reason Harry came back this year, per Lewis, FWIW
Nothing I can see in either of those posts provides any evidence that the Wilfs forced Darnold to be released in favor of playing McCarthy.The above bolded actually incorrect per a post (see link below) I made on 12/3 following the Seahawk game; the information I cited was from Alex Lewis’ the Vikings beat reporter for The Athletic. Below the first link, is a link to the article on 12/1.
You’re stating your opinion without any third party attestation vs. me quoting a source inside Winter Park; no one gets them all right kiddo
Post in thread 'All Things 2025 Minnesota Vikings In-Season Thread'
https://gopherhole.com/boards/threa...-vikings-in-season-thread.118929/post-3232804
Post in thread 'All Things 2025 Minnesota Vikings In-Season Thread'
https://gopherhole.com/boards/threa...-vikings-in-season-thread.118929/post-3231383
I have no idea what a ban bet is.The above bolded actually incorrect per a post (see link below) I made on 12/3 following the Seahawk game; the information I cited was from Alex Lewis’ the Vikings beat reporter for The Athletic. Below the first link, is a link to the article on 12/1.
You’re stating your opinion without any third party attestation vs. me quoting a source inside Winter Park; no one gets them all right kiddo
Post in thread 'All Things 2025 Minnesota Vikings In-Season Thread'
https://gopherhole.com/boards/threa...-vikings-in-season-thread.118929/post-3232804
Post in thread 'All Things 2025 Minnesota Vikings In-Season Thread'
https://gopherhole.com/boards/threa...-vikings-in-season-thread.118929/post-3231383
I did move the goalposts, about 1mm.You moved the Goal Posts.
I don't claim to know Jack Squat about Long Snappers. I only knew Jacksonville had a Pro Bowl Long Snapper because Greg Olsen mentioned him in the Jags-Colts game. I found it humourous someone on this board of previously seemed to infer that they had as many as the Vikings. Multiple times.
They did not get shut out.
Jags - 1
Vikes - 0
If the Vikings Long Snapper qualified (as he did the 3 previous seasons) then my original post on Tuesday would not included a blank list of home town honorees.
FOX9 also deemed it noteworthy that the Vikings were goose egged for the first time since 2014 and 3rd time ever.
No Vikings added to Pro Bowl roster for 1st time since 2014 | FOX 9 Minneapolis-St. Paul
For the first time in more than a decade, no Minnesota Vikings players will be on the NFL's Pro Bowl roster.www.fox9.com
Last year the Vikings had 7 Pro Bowl representatives. I suppose that was aided by going 14-3 last year.
I hope you send the Sports Director at KMSP your comments about the Jags. Give them hell!
Still hope for the Purple faithful. Could get an injury replacement or fill in for a Super Bowl player I suppose.
Since you didn't include a link and since I don't know if you have the authority to make this statement (maybe you are a neuroscientist yourself?), I asked ChatGPT.My goodness, you say so many ridiculous things on this thread, but I can’t let this one pass. For a number of years now, neuroscientists have established that the human brain is not fully developed until age 25. You speak with such assurance about something you are totally off the mark on. Yes, reps matter, but 25 is not interchangeable with 22 (not in football and not in life).
This is the basis for the “25 years old” figure.The prefrontal cortex — responsible for planning, impulse control, risk evaluation, and long-term consequences.
I think non-playoff teams are capped at 18? I could be wrong there.Could drop all the way to 20 in the draft.
LOL
Darnold wasn’t released, he wasn’t resignedNothing I can see in either of those posts provides any evidence that the Wilfs forced Darnold to be released in favor of playing McCarthy.
KAM and KOC were given free rein to cut Darnold and claim that McCarthy was ready. An incredible blunder
I have no idea what a ban bet is.
If you're offering to voluntarily not post in this thread for some amount of time when Rodgers and the Steelers beat the Ravens in Pittsburgh this week, that's of no value or interest to me. Post as much or as little as you like. If I don't like one of your posts, I'll just skip past it and not comment on it.
Given he’s a premier coordinator and hasn’t been interviewed since, just using it as a general term as owners clearly have overlooked numerous other guys with indiscretion/personnel issues in the past and if it was just that he was bad on personnel, then wtf are we doing in MN employing him?
Is just interesting he has remained without an interview. I don’t blame owners, but if we’re just rolling resumes out there, his is absolutely in the mix/getting interviews if you detach the lawsuit and the personnel stuff clearly vikes players love him (see Murphy comments recently for example)
My guess is you’re @MplsGopher back once again, under yet another alias.
You’re already annoying posters on the football/basketball boards, so it won’t be long before you’re banned yet again, as you can’t help yourself from arguing about anything/everything due to your insecurities - I pity you bro. You’re a sad little man.
I've always found it interesting that people assume if a coach is a good coordinator they should get an opportunity to be a head coach. Being a good coordinator does not automatically make someone a good head coach.