You haven't made any point why anyone should care about a one year blip in season cash. You just point at it, as if it's supposed to be self evident of something.
I don't see any valid reason for there to be any such "something", though.
Very easy to show why it doesn't work:
- scenario A: owners decide no one gets any bonus in a new contract
- scenario B: owners decide they want to give huge bonuses in all new contracts
Exact same total value of the contracts in both cases, so will ultimately (over X years) have the same cumulative cap hits. But in scenario B there is a big blip in season cash the first year.
So what?
Make a logical argument for how this season's blip in cash proves something about KAM.
Again, I'm happy to use it as an excuse to fire KAM. But that really seems to be all you're doing here.