Non-Conference Scheduling

[Ope3]

To me, the move just doesn’t make sense for the MWC….they split their pie two more ways. They have to compete with good programs. To gain what?

With all the teams leaving the MWC to the Pac 12 (version 2.0) don't they need schools to meet the minimum NCAA quotas for some aspects and/or give them a cushion when others bail?

 

[Some guy]

With all the teams leaving the MWC to the Pac 12 (version 2.0) don't they need schools to meet the minimum NCAA quotas for some aspects and/or give them a cushion when others bail?

I thought they got one. But if they didn’t that would’ve been what it gained them.
I actually think it was the pac 12 looking for an 8th team but I think they got one

 

[disco]

I thought they got one. But if they didn’t that would’ve been what it gained them.
I actually think it was the pac 12 looking for an 8th team but I think they got one

MWC was fine once they added UTEP and made Hawaii a full member. It was the PAC that was desperate, and added Texas State.

What's the closest MWC school to the xDSU's? Wyoming?

 

[swede2]

To me, the move just doesn’t make sense for the MWC….they split their pie two more ways. They have to compete with good programs. To gain what?

This is all trickling out long after the fact. I think this scenario would have played out in the event that UNLV and Air Force left the MWC. The MWC would have in effect paid the $5 million fee to move from FCS to FBS for each school plus some additional sums for further investment in FB at those schools. In the end, MWC paid handsomely to keep UNLV and AF in the fold, which was obviously the better outcome for the conference. Long story short, it wasn't the intent to add xDSUs to the conference fold as it presently exists but more of an Armageddon scenario.