All Things 2025 College Football D2 and D3 Thread

Donate To GopherHole
Ope3 said:
St Olaf Men's Hockey Roster is 28 players. Tuition and housing is a $77,000 tab.

28 X 77,000 = $2,156,000.00
Click to expand...
St olaf wouldn't be able to find 28 other students to fill those spots that aren't hockey players? Are they that desperate for students?
 

Word said:
St olaf wouldn't be able to find 28 other students to fill those spots that aren't hockey players? Are they that desperate for students?
Click to expand...
In general there are several institutions of higher learning that indeed are desperate to keep the enrollment numbers up through bolstering their athletic teams rosters.
 


Word said:
St olaf wouldn't be able to find 28 other students to fill those spots that aren't hockey players? Are they that desperate for students?
Click to expand...
Everyone is, the fertility rate is 1.7 or something
Same reason schools are farming international students


www.bestcolleges.com

Closed Colleges: List of Closures, Mergers, and Trendline | BestColleges

Close to 80 private nonprofit colleges closed or merged between 2020 and 2024. Find historical data about college closures and a list of closed colleges and mergers.
www.bestcolleges.com www.bestcolleges.com
 



Some guy said:
Everyone is, the fertility rate is 1.7 or something
Same reason schools are farming international students


www.bestcolleges.com

Closed Colleges: List of Closures, Mergers, and Trendline | BestColleges

Close to 80 private nonprofit colleges closed or merged between 2020 and 2024. Find historical data about college closures and a list of closed colleges and mergers.
www.bestcolleges.com www.bestcolleges.com
Click to expand...
Northland College in Ashland, WI, about 20 miles from where I'm sitting right now, had their final graduation this year as well but isn't on the map.
 

I don't really buy that the athletic programs in many D2 and D3 drive enrollment for the general student body. But even if they did that would only be a side effect of the athletic programs.

There are many things that happen on a college campus that are not there to turn a profit. They exist to round out a college experience, drive school pride, bring students together(whether to play or spectate) give alumni a focal point in their post graduate lives and provide recreation and escape for students in what should be rigorous academic atmosphere.

And that is the way it should be.
 

WoodburyTim said:
I don't really buy that the athletic programs in many D2 and D3 drive enrollment for the general student body. But even if they did that would only be a side effect of the athletic programs.

There are many things that happen on a college campus that are not there to turn a profit. They exist to round out a college experience, drive school pride, bring students together(whether to play or spectate) give alumni a focal point in their post graduate lives and provide recreation and escape for students in what should be rigorous academic atmosphere.

And that is the way it should be.
Click to expand...
One anecdote only, but one I see in my community repeated over and over - my former neighbor girl, recently graduated, is playing basketball for something called "Central College" in Iowa. She's a 5'7" forward who, while she started for her high school team, was perhaps the 4th or 5th best player of the starting five. She has explicitly stated she's going to Central because she can play basketball there.

I have a friend in administration for a UMAC school and that school has added athletic programs specifically as a recruitment tool. The school opted to forego football due to cost but added men's soccer. The school instituted hiring and wage freezes this academic year after previously dropping academic programs due to declining enrollment and uncertainty about international student visas. Notably absent from the chopping block: athletic programs.

For most schools and athletic programs, I believe that your first statement in your first paragraph may have been true once upon a time but in today's very competitive and challenging environment, athletic programs are absolutely part of enrollment.
 

swede2 said:
One anecdote only, but one I see in my community repeated over and over - my former neighbor girl, recently graduated, is playing basketball for something called "Central College" in Iowa. She's a 5'7" forward who, while she started for her high school team, was perhaps the 4th or 5th best player of the starting five. She has explicitly stated she's going to Central because she can play basketball there.

I have a friend in administration for a UMAC school and that school has added athletic programs specifically as a recruitment tool. The school opted to forego football due to cost but added men's soccer. The school instituted hiring and wage freezes this academic year after previously dropping academic programs due to declining enrollment and uncertainty about international student visas. Notably absent from the chopping block: athletic programs.

For most schools and athletic programs, I believe that your first statement in your first paragraph may have been true once upon a time but in today's very competitive and challenging environment, athletic programs are absolutely part of enrollment.
Click to expand...
Central is a JUCO, isn't it? I know someone who went there to play baseball and received an offer from a major D1 school after playing there for two years.
 



swede2 said:
One anecdote only, but one I see in my community repeated over and over - my former neighbor girl, recently graduated, is playing basketball for something called "Central College" in Iowa. She's a 5'7" forward who, while she started for her high school team, was perhaps the 4th or 5th best player of the starting five. She has explicitly stated she's going to Central because she can play basketball there.

I have a friend in administration for a UMAC school and that school has added athletic programs specifically as a recruitment tool. The school opted to forego football due to cost but added men's soccer. The school instituted hiring and wage freezes this academic year after previously dropping academic programs due to declining enrollment and uncertainty about international student visas. Notably absent from the chopping block: athletic programs.

For most schools and athletic programs, I believe that your first statement in your first paragraph may have been true once upon a time but in today's very competitive and challenging environment, athletic programs are absolutely part of enrollment.
Click to expand...
I think your first paragraph is what I am saying. She went there because she wanted to play basketball and be part of a team. A selling point for that school. All part of the college experience.

My disagreement is that there are significant amount of kids choosing certain D2 and D3 schools because they have athletic teams(that they aren't playing on). I would never choose a school based on that or want my kids to do that, but I would think if someone is that sports crazy they would choose a D1 school?
 

WoodburyTim said:
I think your first paragraph is what I am saying. She went there because she wanted to play basketball and be part of a team. A selling point for that school. All part of the college experience.

My disagreement is that there are significant amount of kids choosing certain D2 and D3 schools because they have athletic teams(that they aren't playing on). I would never choose a school based on that or want my kids to do that, but I would think if someone is that sports crazy they would choose a D1 school?
Click to expand...
I'd agree with that. I don't think many would choose a D3 as a sports fan unless they were playing, or involved with a team (like a student trainer) somehow. But there are totally kids that would go to Bama or tOSU or Notre Dame for those reasons.
 

swede2 said:
One anecdote only, but one I see in my community repeated over and over - my former neighbor girl, recently graduated, is playing basketball for something called "Central College" in Iowa. She's a 5'7" forward who, while she started for her high school team, was perhaps the 4th or 5th best player of the starting five. She has explicitly stated she's going to Central because she can play basketball there.

I have a friend in administration for a UMAC school and that school has added athletic programs specifically as a recruitment tool. The school opted to forego football due to cost but added men's soccer. The school instituted hiring and wage freezes this academic year after previously dropping academic programs due to declining enrollment and uncertainty about international student visas. Notably absent from the chopping block: athletic programs.

For most schools and athletic programs, I believe that your first statement in your first paragraph may have been true once upon a time but in today's very competitive and challenging environment, athletic programs are absolutely part of enrollment.
Click to expand...
I know of a local small, private college that plays soccer at the lowest D3 level and takes a ton of players on its team. A huge chunk of those kids will never play varsity (and even varsity is a pretty low level of college soccer). So they probably are making a decent amount of money off those kids. My question was always if the cost of football and hockey make those teams as profitable.
 

disco said:
I'd agree with that. I don't think many would choose a D3 as a sports fan unless they were playing, or involved with a team (like a student trainer) somehow. But there are totally kids that would go to Bama or tOSU or Notre Dame for those reasons.
Click to expand...
Agree 100%. Duke didn't become as elite of an academic school until their basketball team became elite. I don't think it was coincidence. More applications means you can be pickier. I know 2 Duke grads from 30-ish years ago and they both say they wouldn't get into Duke now as the standards have gone up considerably.
 



swede2 said:
One anecdote only, but one I see in my community repeated over and over - my former neighbor girl, recently graduated, is playing basketball for something called "Central College" in Iowa. She's a 5'7" forward who, while she started for her high school team, was perhaps the 4th or 5th best player of the starting five. She has explicitly stated she's going to Central because she can play basketball there.
Click to expand...
Central College is a DIII school in Pella. Average women's basketball program. They got a new coach a couple years ago, his second season was better than his first so maybe he's turning it around there.
 

No 2025 outlook yet for the MIAC or UMAC, but D3 Football did release its preseason Top 25 with records from last year. Two Minnesota teams ranked, along with four over in Wisconsin and one in Iowa:
  1. North Central (IL) 15-0
  2. Mount Union (OH) 14-1
  3. Johns Hopkins (MD) 12-2
  4. Susquehanna (PA) 12-2
  5. St. John's (MN) 11-1
  6. Hardin-Simmons (TX) 10-1
  7. Salisbury (MD) 12-1
  8. Mary Hardin-Baylor (TX) 8-4
  9. Wartburg (IA) 10-2
  10. Cortland (NY) 11-1
  11. Wisconsin La Crosse 8-4
  12. Bethel (MN) 11-3
  13. Springfield (MA) 12-1
  14. DePauw (IN) 11-1
  15. Wisconsin Platteville 9-2
  16. Linfield (OR) 10-2
  17. Wheaton (IL) 9-2
  18. Carnegie Mellon (PA) 10-2
  19. Wisconsin River Falls 7-3
  20. Hope (MI) 11-1
  21. Randolph-Macon (VA) 10-2
  22. Aurora (IL) 9-2
  23. Grove City (PA) 9-2
  24. Wisconsin Whitewater 6-4
  25. John Carroll (OH) 9-3
 

disco said:
Central is a JUCO, isn't it? I know someone who went there to play baseball and received an offer from a major D1 school after playing there for two years.
Click to expand...
It may have been at one time but it is a four year institution now. There was a rash of private JUCOs that became four year schools in the last couple of decades. Bethany in Mankato, for one.
 

WoodburyTim said:
My disagreement is that there are significant amount of kids choosing certain D2 and D3 schools because they have athletic teams(that they aren't playing on). I would never choose a school based on that or want my kids to do that, but I would think if someone is that sports crazy they would choose a D1 school?
Click to expand...
I guess I understood the assertion to mean that schools are using the opportunity to be on an athletic team (and thus get a whole bunch of tuition paying student athletes) as recruiting tool, not the mere existence of athletic teams as a significant recruiting tool to non-athletes. I agree that athletics might be part of an overall collegiate experience appeal but not a primary recruiting tool to non-athletes.

I do think athletic success does raise a school's profile and assists in recruiting non-athletes, but I think that the lower the level, the less effect it has.
 

Word said:
I know of a local small, private college that plays soccer at the lowest D3 level and takes a ton of players on its team. A huge chunk of those kids will never play varsity (and even varsity is a pretty low level of college soccer). So they probably are making a decent amount of money off those kids. My question was always if the cost of football and hockey make those teams as profitable.
Click to expand...
St John's FB fits this bill. A friend's kid went to St John's a year or two removed from undergrad and was "on the football team." He was at about #28 on the depth chart for tight ends.
 

disco said:
Central is a JUCO, isn't it? I know someone who went there to play baseball and received an offer from a major D1 school after playing there for two years.
Click to expand...
Central is in the American Rivers Conference in Iowa. It the same leval / Div as the MIAC in MN. All private schools with high tuition.
 

I think athletics matter for the D2/D3 general student population. If nothing else, for name recognition. For example, there's a perception difference between attending Mankato/St. Cloud versus Metro State. I have no doubt that schools like St. Cloud or Crookston would eliminate all athletics if they thought it wouldn't impact non-athlete enrollment.
 

Panthadad2 said:
I think athletics matter for the D2/D3 general student population. If nothing else, for name recognition. For example, there's a perception difference between attending Mankato/St. Cloud versus Metro State. I have no doubt that schools like St. Cloud or Crookston would eliminate all athletics if they thought it wouldn't impact non-athlete enrollment.
Click to expand...
Metro is kind of a different animal. It's geared toward non-traditional students.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.



Top Bottom