Stan The Caddy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,730
- Reaction score
- 86
- Points
- 48
The Nebraska QB has been ruled out. Iowa gets to face their backup.
Go Huskers!
Go Huskers!
hmmmm....well on the plus side, Iowa won't really know what to expect from the backup since he has hardly played.....but this probably doesn't bode well for Nebraska's chances to win the game.The Nebraska QB has been ruled out. Iowa gets to face their backup.
Go Huskers!
If we win Illinois game we still need Nebraska to beat IowaThe hits keep coming. This sucks. But, when you lose at home to Illinois and blow a lead in a rivalry game, you narrow the margin for error considerably.
Yep, it was the Iowa game that cost us. Even if we had won both (Iowa, Illinois) the Wisconsin game would still be a must win.If we win Illinois game we still need Nebraska to beat Iowa
already Iowa -1.5 as it swingsThe game was removed from betting sites. Curious to see what it pops back up as re: Line. Was Huskers -3.5
Yep, Wisconsin game never dropped in terms of importance for us to have a shot at the West. Iowa loss just took control out of our hands and made it so we need help in addition to a win over Wisconsin to win the division. Going to be a crazy weekend, starting with that Iowa/Nebraska game on Friday night.Yep, it was the Iowa game that cost us. Even if we had won both (Iowa, Illinois) the Wisconsin game would still be a must win.
Afternoon.Going to be a crazy weekend, starting with that Iowa/Nebraska game on Friday night.
If you ask BTN, they think he's the sole reason that Nebraska is so tough in their opinion!Hard to say if this is bad news or good. Martinez makes things happen, but frequently it’s for the other team.
I tend to believe this actually.If you ask BTN, they think he's the sole reason that Nebraska is so tough in their opinion!
This whole situation has to be a little scary for the Iowa defensive staff. You have a Huskers team with literally nothing to lose, playing at home with a QB that you will have very little tape on. If Nebraska wants to go off book and throw something totally new at a team this is the week to do it.I tend to believe this actually.
half the Nebraska fan base has wanted a new QB for two years. Last year they got one a little bit and it was a disaster. And that guy isn’t even there anymore.
I gotta believe the backup QB is worse than the starter in most cases. In very few cases I think they are pretty equal.
Sometimes a new quarterback can be worse but make the team around him play better due to the change in vibe: let’s hope that is the case. Like, I think Padilla is just as bad or worse than petras but I think the wideouts played better than usual for him the first game. Then Iowa looked awful on offense again against Illinois
Does Wisconsin clinch the west with an Iowa victory Friday night?Yep, Wisconsin game never dropped in terms of importance for us to have a shot at the West. Iowa loss just took control out of our hands and made it so we need help in addition to a win over Wisconsin to win the division. Going to be a crazy weekend, starting with that Iowa/Nebraska game on Friday night.
Nope. Just eliminates us, they still need the win to get the West.Does Wisconsin clinch the west with an Iowa victory Friday night?
Us with PadillaI mean at this point with a guy like AM you know what is coming. With a backup, for one week, everything is on the table.
Correct. Just makes it so that the outcome of our game no longer determines who wins the West.Nope. Just eliminates us, they still need the win to get the West.
For the referees on this site, what does this mean?Line moved from Nebraska -3.5 to Iowa -1.5
Parlay (3 Picks)
+626
Purdue
-700
Indiana @ Purdue
Minnesota
+210
Wisconsin (#15) @ Minnesota
Nebraska
+105
Iowa (#17) @ Nebraska
If Iowa and Minnesota win, Iowa wins the vision. So quite the opposite.Does Wisconsin clinch the west with an Iowa victory Friday night?
Are you really that stubborn that you can't let go of this stupid argument from another thread? Not sure why it is so difficult to admit that our game determines who wins the West because there is no way to know who won the division until our game goes final.Correct. Just makes it so that the outcome of our game no longer determines who wins the West.
This was literally one of the dumbest things I'veever seen argued on this board... And I've seen a lot.Are you really that stubborn that you can't let go of this stupid argument from another thread? Not sure why it is so difficult to admit that our game determines who wins the West because there is no way to know who won the division until our game goes final.
Would it be easier for you if people said the winner of the West will be determined after our game with Wisconsin is complete? You are way too hung up on this distinction and need to let it go.
Start of the day with Nebraska -3.5 we had a 17.5% chance of winning division now it's down to 13.7%. And then adjusted slightly higher since the lines aren't even each way so Vegas makes moneyFor the referees on this site, what does this mean?