John Galt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 11,750
- Reaction score
- 2,853
- Points
- 113
Does Trumain Brock count? Was a Brewster recruit.
yep, missed him. 5-4 Kill vs. the "greatest recruiter that ever lived."
Does Trumain Brock count? Was a Brewster recruit.
Here's the list of Brewster recruits in the NFL:
1. Rashede Hageman
2. MarQueis Gray
3. Brock Vereen
Here's a list of Kill recruits in the NFL:
1. David Cobb
2. Cedric Thompson
3. Maxx Williams
4. Damien Wilson
5. Isaac Fruechte
Brewster's list is complete and will never grow. Most of Kill's players are all still in school and his list will grow exponentially. Kill will probably be at no less than 8 (Murray, BBC, Campbell) when the NFL starts next season. I bet he gets to at least 15 by the time this year's freshman graduate.
So please, once and for all, end the myth that Brewster recruited any kind of significant talent to the U.
Depends what were arguing. kill and Co were clearly better developers of talent. All those guys mentioned under brew played two years or more for Kill and I think he had a hand in them getting drafted. Brew brought in some talented guys I believe Simoni Lawrence and Lee Campbell like Fruchete and Thompson spent time on practice squads. Triplett was drafted by the Vikes and got cut. I think there are guys whthat if they had to chance for Kill more than one year would've made it. McKnight, Tinsley had he lived, Keenan Cooper. Brew brought some good athletes in, he just couldn't coach them up and thta's why he lost as much as he did and got fired. Kill's class of 2012 wasn't that touted, but so many contributors to the program came out of it, some are currently in the NFL and some will be.Here's the list of Brewster recruits in the NFL:
1. Rashede Hageman
2. MarQueis Gray
3. Brock Vereen
Here's a list of Kill recruits in the NFL:
1. David Cobb
2. Cedric Thompson
3. Maxx Williams
4. Damien Wilson
5. Isaac Fruechte
Brewster's list is complete and will never grow. Most of Kill's players are all still in school and his list will grow exponentially. Kill will probably be at no less than 8 (Murray, BBC, Campbell) when the NFL starts next season. I bet he gets to at least 15 by the time this year's freshman graduate.
So please, once and for all, end the myth that Brewster recruited any kind of significant talent to the U.
Gutey 2.0 on the way.
a) 9 of the 17 kids are from Minnesota. Those guys aren't going anywhere.
b) Kids flip all the time regardless of coaching situation. Sure, Snelson might flip, but people have been worried about that since the day he committed.
c) We are just guessing that there are some number of players who would flip due to a prolonged coaching search, but would stay because of Claeys.
d) Between those 3 factors you're looking at maybe 1 or 2 guys who would choose to go elsewhere merely because of the uncertainty.
e) There's only about a 50% chance that any particular player ends up making a real impact.
Finding the best possible coach is 100x more important than holding on to 1 or 2 recruits. Think of it this way. In retrospect would you rather have had Brewster + 2 extra recruits or Kill without those recruits? Every single person who has ever posted on this board would choose the latter.
I'm not saying that Claeys is the same as Brewster, just making a point that you don't make coaching decisions based on retaining recruits.
Gutey 2.0 on the way.
Another question that begs to be asked is how many of those Brewster recruits would be playing in the NFL if they had played for Tim their entire Gopher careers.
This program is SO close. SO very close to a point where the floor is raised to 7-9 wins and the ceiling is a B1G title. Even if Claeys isn't the guy that brings rose bowl glory to the U, he is critical to maintaining the slow burn to where the program simply doesn't take a step back for minor bad events.
Hire him on a good contract, promote Sawvel to DC, maintain most of these recruits, get geared up for 2 really winnable schedules with alot of talent coming back, and get the facilities done coming off of 5 or more years of good football and we'll be in a really good place.
Waiver, wait, or try to double down and hit on a new coach and the whole thing could come crashing down to the point where you're looking at another fringe bowl game era for awhile.
Another question that begs to be asked is how many of those Brewster recruits would be playing in the NFL if they had played for Tim their entire Gopher careers.
Is he reporting this as a media member or U of M insider. In either case it is terrible reporting.@GopherHole: Dave Mona said he thinks 90% chance that Tracy Claeys will be named full time #Gophers coach within 5 days.
Here's the list of Brewster recruits in the NFL: 1. Rashede Hageman 2. MarQueis Gray 3. Brock Vereen Here's a list of Kill recruits in the NFL: 1. David Cobb 2. Cedric Thompson 3. Maxx Williams 4. Damien Wilson 5. Isaac Fruechte Brewster's list is complete and will never grow. Most of Kill's players are all still in school and his list will grow exponentially. Kill will probably be at no less than 8 (Murray, BBC, Campbell) when the NFL starts next season. I bet he gets to at least 15 by the time this year's freshman graduate. So please, once and for all, end the myth that Brewster recruited any kind of significant talent to the U.
Depends what were arguing. kill and Co were clearly better developers of talent. All those guys mentioned under brew played two years or more for Kill and I think he had a hand in them getting drafted. Brew brought in some talented guys I believe Simoni Lawrence and Lee Campbell like Fruchete and Thompson spent time on practice squads. Triplett was drafted by the Vikes and got cut. I think there are guys whthat if they had to chance for Kill more than one year would've made it. McKnight, Tinsley had he lived, Keenan Cooper. Brew brought some good athletes in, he just couldn't coach them up and thta's why he lost as much as he did and got fired. Kill's class of 2012 wasn't that touted, but so many contributors to the program came out of it, some are currently in the NFL and some will be.
I will take it a step further. I have been a fan since the 80's.
Salem, Holtz, Gutey, Wacker, Mason, Brewster and Kill
What do they all have in common- none of them have won or even have come in top tier few of the Big Ten. Until a coach can do that I am grouping all of them in the same category- some maybe slightly better or worse than others but to have any debate on having any bragging rights on coaching superiority will have to wait until at minimum a big ten championship game or Rose Bowl.
What about being the lousiest of the best and the best of the lousy?
Despite all the hate he generated by jumping ship, Holtz was by far the best coach since Warmath and would have taken us to the Rose Bowl in a very few years.
Despite all the hate he generated by jumping ship, Holtz was by far the best coach since Warmath and would have taken us to the Rose Bowl in a very few years. Mason and Kill next, then Stoll at a lower level - the others far behind, though Gutey was the best of the losers.
The long slow slide to a new coach with an empty cupboard in 2019 starts by making no effort to bring in a new coach now. <b>Would Claeys even be considered by the likes of Illinois or Maryland? </b>This is how guys in Arkansas end up marrying their sister; "Well, she's a girl and she's already living in the house...so why not?"
This is how guys in Arkansas end up marrying their sister; "Well, she's a girl and she's already living in the trailer...so why not?"
Let's not forget that Gutey had two winning conference seasons. Mason also had two. Nobody else since Warmath had more than 1.
In both of those years, 4 of their 5 Big Ten wins came against: Northwestern, Purdue, Indiana, and Wisconsin. All of which were horrible.
In both of those years, 4 of their 5 Big Ten wins came against: Northwester, Purdue, Indiana, and Wisconsin. All of which were horrible.
yes, he would. If he could bring the staff with him, he would get those jobs.