everybody knows my name
Freakishly Hyperintelligent
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 2,742
- Reaction score
- 638
- Points
- 113
What kind of doghouse do you have to be in to be held out of a game like this one?
I agree Zack or another backup should have played, but I think PJ must feel like if he does that, that he is sending a message to the team that they are giving up. He must believe so strongly in not sending that message to his team that he refuses to play the backups.
Nobody is in any doghouse.What kind of doghouse do you have to be in to be held out of a game like this one?
That might work in a game like last night when behind, but it doesn't explain last week when we were ahead by that much and still no back ups got to play. What kind of message does it send to the team that starters play regardless of the score. What back up is going to bust his ass all year long in practice knowing he has no shot at playing, even in a blowout one way or the other?I agree Zack or another backup should have played, but I think PJ must feel like if he does that, that he is sending a message to the team that they are giving up. He must believe so strongly in not sending that message to his team that he refuses to play the backups.
He should have had some playing time against Illinois for sure, and probably late against Iowa.What kind of doghouse do you have to be in to be held out of a game like this one?
So he is Jerry kill. Let’s his star qb walk out and then we get crap at qb.Nobody is in any doghouse.
Remember 2018? How long Fleck kept a gimpy, struggling Annexstad in the games????
Fleck is a stubborn mule.
Or Bryce Williams (who was available to play vs Iowa). Or Jason Williamson (2019 Minnesota Mr. Football) if he was healthy and ready. Or Ky Thomas (2020 4* recruit). Or Kendal Moore (2020, walk-on?).Maybe PJ won’t play a back-up QB in the 4Q of games that are either well in hand or hopelessly lost because, given Tanner’s up-and-down season so far, he doesn’t want a good performance by a back-up to start a QB controversy(?). Just another headache to deal with. Why PJ won’t spell Mo in those situations is a real puzzler, though. No way for us to know whether Mo is starting to get beat down by the season. He’s amazing but human; 130+ carries in 4 games, more and more of them seemingly inside the tackles, is asking a lot. Hell, give Preston Jelen a shot if his legs are fresh.
If this is the case, and I hope it is not, I would have to seriously question his leadership and decision making ability. Difficult conversations, F.A.M.I.L.Y, etc, would ring pretty hollow.Maybe PJ won’t play a back-up QB in the 4Q of games that are either well in hand or hopelessly lost because, given Tanner’s up-and-down season so far, he doesn’t want a good performance by a back-up to start a QB controversy(?). Just another headache to deal with. Why PJ won’t spell Mo in those situations is a real puzzler, though. No way for us to know whether Mo is starting to get beat down by the season. He’s amazing but human; 130+ carries in 4 games, more and more of them seemingly inside the tackles, is asking a lot. Hell, give Preston Jelen a shot if his legs are fresh.