Anybody get a chance to read Souhan's latest? I thought Reusse's recent column was the nadir for sports journalism in this town, but Souhan's giving him a run for his money. Souhan's basic point is that the Gophers shouldn't be seen to be underdogs, but should instead realize that if they lose against Xavier, they are underachieving failures. It's truly unbelievable.
Here's a season where the storyline could not be more clear. The Gophers lost three probable starters, were counted out by most, had dissension in the team, were statistically one of the unluckiest in D-1 basketball, and had one chance to redeem themselves. They did so by playing their best basketball of the season to rescue themselves, and get themselves back to the tournament. It's a great story. Instead, Reusse and Souhan look for the most negative spin to place on it. I'd understand if they were simply attempting to get a different angle on a story, but they don't have any problem going for the easy cheap shots at Minnesota sports teams that are failing. And I don't necessarily fault them for that. But don't be constantly negative. Write something positive ONCE in a while.
It's obvious that they're just reflexively anti-Minnesota sports fans. I can no more trust their "journalistic integrity" than I can in reading a Fox News report on Obama, or an MSNBC report on Obama, for that matter. The bias is too clear. Plus, to be honest, Reusse used to be a pretty good stylist, and somewhat entertaining. Not anymore. He's become so invested in "poking" Gophers fans, he's lost all entertainment value. I call it the Doonesbury effect. On the other hand, Souhan's never had an ounce of talent as a columnist. Not even a little bit. I say, with no reservation whatsoever, that I would be twice the columnist he is, right now, with no training whatsoever, writing from home, and so would about 65% of this board. The guy is terrible (though he wasn't too bad as a beat reporter.) Seriously, Star Trib and Pioneer Press, any chance you could hire somebody competent to cover sports in this town? Maybe people would start thinking about buying your newspapers again. I don't buy them now because I can find better writing on four or five sites for each sport the papers cover.
Here's a season where the storyline could not be more clear. The Gophers lost three probable starters, were counted out by most, had dissension in the team, were statistically one of the unluckiest in D-1 basketball, and had one chance to redeem themselves. They did so by playing their best basketball of the season to rescue themselves, and get themselves back to the tournament. It's a great story. Instead, Reusse and Souhan look for the most negative spin to place on it. I'd understand if they were simply attempting to get a different angle on a story, but they don't have any problem going for the easy cheap shots at Minnesota sports teams that are failing. And I don't necessarily fault them for that. But don't be constantly negative. Write something positive ONCE in a while.
It's obvious that they're just reflexively anti-Minnesota sports fans. I can no more trust their "journalistic integrity" than I can in reading a Fox News report on Obama, or an MSNBC report on Obama, for that matter. The bias is too clear. Plus, to be honest, Reusse used to be a pretty good stylist, and somewhat entertaining. Not anymore. He's become so invested in "poking" Gophers fans, he's lost all entertainment value. I call it the Doonesbury effect. On the other hand, Souhan's never had an ounce of talent as a columnist. Not even a little bit. I say, with no reservation whatsoever, that I would be twice the columnist he is, right now, with no training whatsoever, writing from home, and so would about 65% of this board. The guy is terrible (though he wasn't too bad as a beat reporter.) Seriously, Star Trib and Pioneer Press, any chance you could hire somebody competent to cover sports in this town? Maybe people would start thinking about buying your newspapers again. I don't buy them now because I can find better writing on four or five sites for each sport the papers cover.