Ewert86PC
Metrodome Era Survivor
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2010
- Messages
- 7,168
- Reaction score
- 2,396
- Points
- 113
I grew up in a Gopher family. Mother, Aunt and family friends went to the U. I followed Gopher sports long before the pro sports teams in town.
Because of this family connection, I went to the U and graduated.
As far as "complaining" goes, first universities are built on academic thinking, the finding, examining and describing smaller parts of a whole. This means any sport could be broken down and examined in smaller parts of the game.
These smaller aspects of the game give rise to unique questions that if addressed properly helps the team. Questions get formulated like the following. Why is a basketball team that misses half of it's free throws more likely to lose a game? Why does a football team with faster defensive linemen give up more running yards?
This kind of analysis is something that helps not only teams, but the sports in general. In my opinion, many academics fail to realize this aspect of athletics and dig their heels in against athletics on solely political and moral grounds, which is a huge mistake.
The problem in the Twin Cities is that we have a large media market, and it acts as an echo chamber for complaints, valid or not, about athletics, athletes and their contribution to "traditional academics". This market size also means there are elements, communities and organizations that try to direct stories into the public mind which inflame and blister their agendas. It is the reason that criticism is a political ball that gets kicked around. If you think the criticism is valid then it is being supportive. If you think the criticism is useless, then it is negativity.
This media echo chamber also allows political weight to be created and used against the University since athletics is such a popular endeavor and political issues are the "meat and potatoes" of the schools main source of funding, the State Legislature.
I'll bleed Maroon and Gold even after I've shuffled off this mortal coil.
Because of this family connection, I went to the U and graduated.
As far as "complaining" goes, first universities are built on academic thinking, the finding, examining and describing smaller parts of a whole. This means any sport could be broken down and examined in smaller parts of the game.
These smaller aspects of the game give rise to unique questions that if addressed properly helps the team. Questions get formulated like the following. Why is a basketball team that misses half of it's free throws more likely to lose a game? Why does a football team with faster defensive linemen give up more running yards?
This kind of analysis is something that helps not only teams, but the sports in general. In my opinion, many academics fail to realize this aspect of athletics and dig their heels in against athletics on solely political and moral grounds, which is a huge mistake.
The problem in the Twin Cities is that we have a large media market, and it acts as an echo chamber for complaints, valid or not, about athletics, athletes and their contribution to "traditional academics". This market size also means there are elements, communities and organizations that try to direct stories into the public mind which inflame and blister their agendas. It is the reason that criticism is a political ball that gets kicked around. If you think the criticism is valid then it is being supportive. If you think the criticism is useless, then it is negativity.
This media echo chamber also allows political weight to be created and used against the University since athletics is such a popular endeavor and political issues are the "meat and potatoes" of the schools main source of funding, the State Legislature.
I'll bleed Maroon and Gold even after I've shuffled off this mortal coil.