DanvilleGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2009
- Messages
- 539
- Reaction score
- 529
- Points
- 93
As a player, big difference!!Yes. And Scott Frost won a Natty. Still flopped in the B1G.
As a player, big difference!!Yes. And Scott Frost won a Natty. Still flopped in the B1G.
Think he meant at UCFAs a player, big difference!!
Oh yeah, forgot about that as they really didn't win it..Think he meant at UCF
Depends if the one UCF claimed counts...As a player, big difference!!
There is still 1 more year left (or do you know definitively something different?), THEN it rides off into the sunset!There is no point in comparing anything to "the West".
The West is dead. Next year it rides off into the sunset.
Ranking 1-16 is the appropriate thread.
I meant that 23 is the last year of it.There is still 1 more year left (or do know definitively something different?), THEN it rides off into the sunset!
Fair enough but he’s 2-0 against Minnesota the last two years and regardless of the situations accomplished a TON more than fleck has, hence my ranking.I think Bret a bit overrated right now.
He went 8-4 (5-4) with a roster he didn’t recruit or were 1 year stop gaps like the QB.
He won the big ten with the machine wisconsin he inherited combined with Ohio state, penn state, and Michigan all being down or on sanctions at the same time.
He was 11-29 in conference at Arkansas. His best year was year 3 with the old coach’s players.
I think he is a good coach. But I think 2022 Illinois is closer to 2021 Michigan state than it is to 2006-2009 wisconsin.
My post said absolutely nothing about fleck.Fair enough but he’s 2-0 against Minnesota the last two years and regardless of the situations accomplished a TON more than fleck has, hence my ranking.
It did not but that’s a reason I ranked Bert so high, and you had said he was overratedMy post said absolutely nothing about fleck.
He is overrated right now.It did not but that’s a reason I ranked Bert so high, and you had said he was overrated
could be never know. In 2-3 years we’ll know a lot moreHe is overrated right now.
I think generally people think of him correctly. For some reason people think the guy who lost to Indiana and Michigan state is infallible this year
For sureHe
could be never know. In 2-3 years we’ll know a lot more
Tell us how you really feel...I put Fleck last. He's not a good game manager and his offenses are offensive. He is too caught up in all those cliches. Should not have kept Athan on the bench most of the year. Just don't think he's that bright.
Good grief.There is no point in comparing anything to "the West".
The West is dead. Next year it rides off into the sunset.
Ranking 1-16 is the appropriate thread.
I’m going to start by saying I think Wisconsin made a great hire, but if you’re ranking Fickell that high because he made Cincinnati go undefeated and to the playoffs you better rank PJ Fleck #1. He had Western Michigan… WESTERN MICHIGAN… undefeated and to the Cotton Bowl.If you take the overall package of a coach into consideration - recruiting, game day management, player development, etc., where would you rank our guy Fleck with the revamped Big Ten West coaching ladder?
Obviously we don't know how Rhule or Fickell will do in their new roles and recruiting territories, but still interesting to see where Fleck stacks up.
Ironically, as I look at the BTW vs BTE, I think the West now has better coaches top to bottom, the BTE just has a few helmet schools that cover up a lot of coaching inadequacies.
I would go:
1. Bielema - I can't stand the guy, but he's proven he can win and recruit and I think if he stays at Illinois he'll build them into a regular atop the BTW.
2. Luke Fickell - He took Cinci to the CFP for gosh sakes. Whether he can build the same success at uw remains to be seen, but hard not to admire his combination of recruiting and coaching.
3. Kirk Ferentz - steady eddie and a long term coach. No idea how much he has left, but he's the Dean of Big Ten Coaches and his combo works and works consistently.
4. Matt Rhule - hard to know how the fit will be, but he's already turned around two very different geographical programs in Temple and Baylor. The blueprint is there, even if Nebraska isn't what it used to be.
5. Pat Fitzgerald - Few coaches in America do more with less and while they have wild swings in success, fricking NW has won the West twice in the last 5 years. Next year they need to move back up the standings, but this guy has a formula that works.
6. PJ Fleck - his ranking isn't a slight as I love the guy. But this is a tough list to compare him to. Recruiting isn't as good nationally as I expected and his in-game decisions have been below average at times, but I think his player development has been good. I hope he's here for a long time and I hope we can confidently move him up this list.
7. Jeff Brohm - again, not a slight and I realize he's in the BT title game this week. But it's just a tough group of coaches ahead of him.
It was in South BendWhat are fickell’s greatest wins? Beat ND at cincy?
Fickell's one year as the interim HC at Ohio State (2011) resulted in a 6-7 season. It followed a 12-1 campaign (2010) after which Jim Tressel resigned due to the "scandal" of players selling their memorabilia. In 2012, OSU went 12-0 under Urban Meyer. Pretty sure I could have coached that Buckeye team to a 6-7 record in 2011. He has done great at Cincy, but his power 5 year as HC was a mess.If this is based on current abilities rather than track record I'd put him above Fitz for sure, probably Ferentz, and probably Rhule. Bielema is close. This could be done a lot of different ways, but if I had to I'd go:
Fickell
Bielema
PJ
Rhule
Ferentz
Brohm
Fitz
On the contrary. Some teams in the west are going to have easier schedules some years because of this.The completely subjective analyses listed above will be replaced by objective data when USC and UCLA join the BIG and there are no more divisions.
The top three or four in the BIG will go to the hallowed group of twelve for the playoffs.
The rest of the teams and their coaches will be relegated to also-ran.
The WI AD saw that writing on the wall and decided WI needed an upgrade right away.
There will be no more West cupcakes leavened by a couple of East crossovers.
It will be nine conference games with computer scheduling with one or two rivalry games.
You misunderstood.On the contrary. Some teams in the west are going to have easier schedules some years because of this.
The conference is so big
When Minnesota’s 2029 schedule is:
Iowa
Wisconsin
Purdue
Indiana
Rutgers
Maryland
Michigan state
UCLA
Northwestern
Are you going to complain the lack of divisions led to a soft schedule?
What you just said has nothing to do what I said.You misunderstood.
I am completely in favor of no divisions with one or two rivalry games and a nine or ten conference game schedule.
That would have the potential to make the teams in the West have more difficult schedules than they now currently have because USC and USC are currently stronger teams than any of the West teams and most of the East teams and will be added to the pool.
Your imagined MN schedule seven years from now is simply imaginary mixed in with wishful thinking and is irrelevant.
In the future, the goal of every West team will not be the participation prize of winning the West but ending up in the top twelve in the country.
And this isn’t me saying he is a bad coach. I’m just not ready to crown Illinois perennial contenders in the conference
I’m going to start by saying I think Wisconsin made a great hire, but if you’re ranking Fickell that high because he made Cincinnati go undefeated and to the playoffs you better rank PJ Fleck #1. He had Western Michigan… WESTERN MICHIGAN… undefeated and to the Cotton Bowl.
In all seriousness, there isn’t a bad coach in the Big Ten West.