I think they really need to plan better on when they are bringing players in. The best time is in the fall during the season. The worst time is in Jan.
I guess I don't see this class as being bad. Were folks expecting better with the coaching change and a 3-win season? Only 3 of the recruits are 2* guys. Needs were addressed. No need to be disappointed on this one.
This isn't a great class but it shouldn't set us back at all. I mean, this is a class that the vast majority of the group are three star guys and most of these guys will be able to come in and RS. The 2007 class had a majority of 2star kids. However, even a class like that won't neccesarily kill you (if it is the kids fit) if you are able to develop them. For instance, that 2007 class lost 14 of the 24 guys, 3 of the guys who played through their eligibility were JuCo, and 4 of the remaining 7 players had to play immedietly. That class started out bad (through rankings), but what made it so atrocious was the attrition and inability to RS.
This class could still be a decent class if we are able to retain the vast majority of these recruits and develop them for 5 years.
Hey Guys, don't worry about it. Kill knows what he's doing.
![]()
SuperPrep had the last five Badgers classes rated 40th, 48th, 37th, 41st and 39th nationally, rarely even among the best in the Big Ten. Yet the players from those groups went 11-2 last season and finished tied for eighth in the final USA TODAY Coaches Poll after losing the Rose Bowl by two points to unbeaten TCU. Coaching! Coaching! Coaching!
Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence at all.SuperPrep had the last five Badgers classes rated 40th, 48th, 37th, 41st and 39th nationally, rarely even among the best in the Big Ten. Yet the players from those groups went 11-2 last season and finished tied for eighth in the final USA TODAY Coaches Poll after losing the Rose Bowl by two points to unbeaten TCU. Coaching! Coaching! Coaching!