Bob_Loblaw
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 20,907
- Reaction score
- 16,500
- Points
- 113
I wonder if any programs ever wish they would have made a different hire? Maybe Montana made a big mistake.
I wonder if any assistants from high stature programs ever struggle as head coaches? I can think of a few.
I wonder if the Tom Moe (or was it Dienhart) ever thinks... I wish we would have gone with that Assistant at Gonzaga instead of the head coach back in 1999? Probably not because he didn't have any head coaching experience or background at a high stature program.
Just think if Iowa would have hired Brad Stevens instead of his head coach, Todd Lickliter. They didn't, thankfully, but Butler took a flyer on an assistant coach working in what had been a pretty average program.
I trust that Mark Coyle saw something in Ben besides saving money, or the color of his skin alone. I trust that Coyle really does want to win and felt aligned most strongly with the hire he made, seeing more upside and potential with Ben Johnson than coaches with head experience he talked with or considered.
I think PJ Fleck is obnoxious and he bugs me. Yet, Mark Coyle saw more than that and thought it could work here. It is working to this point. He may or may not be right on this one, but he didn't settle with the hire - he does want to win and hired the person he thought was best. He could have taken more time if he wanted, but he moved on the guy he wanted.
Yeah, I am sure that they do and Ben Johnson's underwhelming resume is certainly not a guarantee that he will fail.
I actually have zero issue with the folks who think Ben will be successful, it's just annoying that some of them are pretending that he hire is in-line with Arizona hire or the Izzo hire. It's a tired argument.