There are student athletes with kids that live with them. Dan Coleman had his son living with him while he was a student athlete at the U of M. I'm not going to get in a pissing match on whats tougher but Rosen main point was that these schools are just pushing kids along to win. There are actual college seniors on teams that can't read. Also, athletes being forced in and out of majors so they don't affect practice time
Both are tough, no question there. I wouldn't have a problem with an extra payment in the living expenses column for an athlete with a child. But the point still remains...if you want to be a D1 athlete you have to recognize that the perks might not be everything that you want them to be. No different than any other job.
On your point about student-athletes not being able to read...I agree. That is not a good thing. But I don't think the answer is to give them more money.