Two Top 10 recruits are unwanted?

coolhandgopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
5,118
Reaction score
1,805
Points
113
I guess Renardo Sidney's found a home with Mississippi State (maybe), but it seems Lance Stephenson is currently on the outside looking in, virtually everywhere. This situation is unusual to say the least, and you wonder if the rumored advancement of the NBA draft eligibility to two years beyond high school graduation will bring more of these types of recruiting situations into college basketball.
http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/11735696

And this on Sidney, from draft express:

Renardo Sidney: Taking a pass on a basketball star

Lance Pugmire of the L.A. Times pens a fascinating story about the bizarre recruitment situation of Renardo Sidney.

USC, as UCLA had before, rescinded its scholarship offer, leaving one of the nation's top talents temporarily without a team.

On Thursday, Sidney, 19, signed a letter of intent with Mississippi State days after visiting Starkville, Miss. The Bulldogs were, at best, his third choice -- but in the end, perhaps his only choice. When, after Sidney's visit, a family spokesman was asked whether Mississippi State was the front-runner for his services, the reply came that the Bulldogs were "the only runner."

A rare turn of events involving a 6-foot-10 prospect with a powerful build and uncommon shooting range for a big man.

"It's highly unusual for both of those schools to abandon their recruitment of a player of that caliber and potential," said George Raveling, a former college coach -- at USC and elsewhere -- who works the Southern California area for Nike. "They must know something the rest of us don't know."

UCLA and USC officials were prohibited by college rules from speaking publicly about Sidney while he was unsigned, and even now they have declined to do so. But sources on both campuses who have knowledge of his recruitment agreed to speak with The Times as long as their identities were kept anonymous.

Though they are from rival schools who often wage intense battles for the same athletes, the sources agreed on this about Sidney: The reward of suiting up such a prodigious talent was not worth the larger risk.

Bruins and Trojans sources both say they were wary of potentially intense NCAA scrutiny prompted by these issues: Despite what was perceived as a limited income, the family moved multiple times and resided in upscale homes during Sidney's high school years; and stepfather Renardo Sr. directed a club basketball team with financial backing that was unclear beyond a relatively modest shoe company sponsorship.

Plus there was this: A source intimately familiar with Sidney's recruitment said a university official thought the stepfather had strongly hinted that he expected to be compensated if his son signed with the school.


There is plenty more in the original article, so do take a look.

We’ve covered Renardo Sidney in extreme depth over the last few years—his DraftExpress profile has 10 scouting entries since 2006—and it’s tough to say that it’s really a big surprise that no one is all that interested in having Sidney play for them.

We’ve spoken with dozens of college coaches and NBA executives while sitting alongside them watching Sidney in action, and no one appears to believe that he can actually help a team win. Players who are as unmotivated and uncoachable as Sidney rarely pan out regardless of how naturally talented they are, and after watching him intently last month on the all-star circuit in games, scrimmages and practices—we’re really starting to question just how good of a player Sidney is. His game reminds of Antoine Walker in the later stages of his career, and you really have to wonder if whatever production he can manage to scrounge together at the college level is worth it considering the baggage involved. Based off the way NBA people talk about him, he doesn’t appear to be any kind of lock at this point either. Playing in Europe (and being successful) would be an even bigger stretch.
 

More and more schools don't want to deal with theses superstar kids who make no secret that they will be gone as soon as they can bolt and have little interest in school. Add on to that the baggage some of them carry and the disruption they bring with them for the one or maybe two years and teams just aren't interested. Now there will always be Calipari's of the world who won't back away, but as we saw first hand with Kris Humphries, a superstar who is only interested in improving his draft position and cares little about anything else is just not worth it. Now there are also the Carmello Anthony's and Kevin Durants of the world who do care about college A and are worth the gamble, I guess each case has to be taken on a case by case basis.
 

More and more schools don't want to deal with theses superstar kids who make no secret that they will be gone as soon as they can bolt and have little interest in school. Add on to that the baggage some of them carry and the disruption they bring with them for the one or maybe two years and teams just aren't interested. Now there will always be Calipari's of the world who won't back away, but as we saw first hand with Kris Humphries, a superstar who is only interested in improving his draft position and cares little about anything else is just not worth it. Now there are also the Carmello Anthony's and Kevin Durants of the world who do care about college A and are worth the gamble, I guess each case has to be taken on a case by case basis.

That's the reason I think they should be allowed to enter the NBA draft. Age 18 and HS graduate should be the only requirements.
 

I find it hard to blame high school kids for a lot of this mess. A lot of the responsibility for these fiascoes lay in the laps of the NBA, the NCAA, the shoe companies, the recruiting services and even ourselves. A lot of these kids are treated like commodities from the moment they exhibit above average ability in the game. The "trickle down" effect that started with the escalation and competition for talent in the college game has gone from the high school ranks to the middle schools and now to even our youngest kids. It's systemic now and unless a massive overhaul is undertaken it is only going to get worse. But it won't and I'll tell you why: Money. No one wants to be the guy who gives up a piece of the pie.

The NCAA doesn't want to give up the billions of dollars in revenue it generates, the coaches don't want to give up the million of dollars they get from lucrative shoe and merchandising deals that make them extremely wealthy, the shoe companies don't want to miss out on a chance to land the next great marketing icon ala Jordan, the recruiting networks don't want to miss out on the cash cow they have (Rivals sold for 100 million dollars recently) and the fans want to see a winner-and to win at the elite level in either football or basketball you need talent.

The only way to change things for the better is to limit the influence of money. Considering the society we live in and how much is actually at stake I don't see that happening anytime soon. You can say "this program is above that" or "that coach is not about that" but you're fooling yourselves. The only place the true spirit of the student-athlete exists anymore is in Division II and lower. Everybody else is scrapping for a piece of the pie.
 




Top Bottom