I meant for a guy with his limited background--job difficulty-wise. I think he'd be way over his head.
Job difficulty does not dictate the "level" of a job. I am sure the Commander-in-Chief, President Obama, "with his limited background--job difficulty-wise" does not know how to be an infantry soldier in combat, but there is no question that Obama has the more important job (and it would absolutely be a promotion if the infantry soldier became Commander-in-Chief). Similarly, conference commissioners may not have the same problems and may not have as
difficult of a job as AD's, but conference commissioners make far more important and far reaching decisions that affect a dozen or more schools. Jim Delany took a big risk when he created the Big Ten Network and it could have gone either way. As it turned out, the universities each get an extra $10 million per year or so from the network - Jim Delany gets a significant amount of credit for this. You can argue that the AD's have a more difficult job, but the AD has the more important job and it would absolutely be a promotion to be one. Just ask these people below:
- John Marinatto was the AD at Providence for 14 years before becoming the Big East Commissioner.
- Mike Slive was the AD at Cornell before becoming the commissioner of the Great Midwest Conference (and later C-USA and then the SEC).
- John Swofford was the AD at North Carolina for 17 years before become the ACC Commissioner.
He is not the AD's boss. He's basically their equal. I doubt if the Commissioner can tell one AD "what to do." If the schools didn't like him, they can fire him, just like the AD can be fired by his school. I'd say he's an approximate equal in stature, lesser in responsibility.
http://spartannation.com/2011/10/26/in-a-week-from-hell-michigan-state-athletic-director-mark-hollis-goes-toe-to-toe-with-b1g-commissioner-jim-delany/
The article above is one example of how the commissioner has authority over the AD. In that situation, the MSU Athletic Department decided not to suspend William Gholston for punching another player during a game. Jim Delany decided to suspend him. He sat out the game. Of course Jim Delany isn't the AD's boss - the university President is the AD's boss - but he is more important, has more authority, and is at least one step above the AD's. As for the responsibility part, the AD's may have more tasks they are responsible for, but the commissioner is responsible for more important stuff (see response above).
As I said above, it would be for this putz. He's a self-promoting putz, who's not really accomplished much. That's my opinion, of course.
You can have your opinion about Thompson, but you are absolutely wrong about the importance of the role of the commissioner to a conference. Here is a quote from one article I came across: "'Conference commissioners are CEOs,' said Shultz, who is editor of the Journal of Sports Media. 'They are in charge of multi
billion-dollar businesses.'
Then there is this article that I recommend you read that outlines the growing role of commissioners:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/preview11/story/_/id/6842482/how-conference-commissioners-became-most-important-men-room
Here are a few quotes from it:
The current job for Delany and his fellow big-six commissioners -- the heads of the SEC, Big 12, Pac-12, Atlantic Coast and Big East -- is multifaceted.
They are media-rights moguls, negotiating humongous deals to broadcast their league's games. They are the keepers of the Bowl Championship Series, for better or worse. They are the ones most likely to decide if we ever have a playoff in college football. They are policy drivers, working closely with NCAA president Mark Emmert to identify potential rules changes. They are conduits to campus, communicating with university presidents who don't necessarily have the time or expertise to obsess about sports the way their fan bases do.
And another quote:
Nothing is more emblematic of the changing role of commissioners than the makeover of the Pac-12. Tom Hansen ran something of a mom-and-pop operation that did not embrace change and left power in the hands of the league's athletic directors. In two high-voltage years on the job, Larry Scott has changed that dynamic.
"They wanted me to come in and lead," Scott said, "and lead aggressively. They wanted more involvement from the commissioner as the ultimate governance of the conference, someone who brings major policy, strategic and financial decisions to the board of directors."
And one last one:
In the constantly shifting power structure of college athletics, conference commissioners have become almost presidential.
They have commander-in-chief accessories: private jets, police escorts, a team of publicists, big salaries, power suits. (In fact, Barack Obama is probably seen more often in public sans coat and tie than Southeastern Conference commish Mike Slive.)
They have commander-in-chief responsibilities: setting agendas, pushing policy, building consensus, maintaining diplomatic relations with other commissioners, delivering State of the Union addresses.
And they have commander-in-chief headaches: disputes to mediate, scandals to navigate, disciplinary action to dole out, public and media criticism to endure.