The question was who could be the next Clemson. Which means is there a team/coach who could contend for national championships on a yearly basis that was not there before.
Clemson went from not winning ACC to dominating it in a short span. "Being Wisconsin" first makes no sense - beating them does. I dont want to sit at the edge of greatness for 2 decades with never sniffing a chance of a national title. I want us to become contenders in 3 - 5 years.
Fleck has proven in 3 years he deserves to be part of that conversation. Getting us there is no even close to gaurenteed. Still, if i had to put money on which team gets a national title in next 10 years I would put MN over WI if coaching stays the same