Does anyone know when we could have some answers???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's not a meeting. If Coyle comes out of his hole and sees his shadow it means Claeys is fired.
The more I think about it the more I think I might be wrong. If Coyle knows TC is back but waits a week to tell anyone it means he is the worst AD of all time.
So I am starting to think he might be gone.
The more I think about it the more I think I might be wrong. If Coyle knows TC is back but waits a week to tell anyone it means he is the worst AD of all time.
So I am starting to think he might be gone.
The more I think about it the more I think I might be wrong. If Coyle knows TC is back but waits a week to tell anyone it means he is the worst AD of all time.
So I am starting to think he might be gone.
The more I think about it the more I think I might be wrong. If Coyle knows TC is back but waits a week to tell anyone it means he is the worst AD of all time.
So I am starting to think he might be gone.
IMHO, if the U makes Claeys the scapegoat by firing him after three 8/9 win seasons Kaler and Coyle also need to go.
There is a total failure of leadership. It appears that they are more interested in blaming than fixing the U's problems. This does not bode well for the U long term.
You need a school chancellor like the dynamic Donna Shalala who gets it. She was only at Wisconsin for just over five years. Her leadership turned the Wisconsin football program around.
If he has been looking for a week he hasn't cost himself any time lookingIsn't the same thing kind of true in the reverse situation, too? If you know you're firing him and sit on it for a week+ before you tell anyone, that's pretty disrespectful to the outgoing staff who all (presumably) need to find new jobs. And worse, if you wait and you don't have a successor already lined up, you're also costing yourself valuable time for your coaching search, and time your new staff will desperately need to recruit, install their program, etc.
Honestly, regardless of what happens, I think the wait looks bad for Coyle, and he hasn't been looking great lately regardless.
I have thought this too ever since the day after the bowl win. If u were going to extend Clayes you would have already done so. If u did want to actually sit down and iron things out and get an extension done, the meeting would have already taken place. Every day we delay hurts recruiting. No need to wait like this unless u were waiting for Fleck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMHO, if the U makes Claeys the scapegoat by firing him after three 8/9 win seasons Kaler and Coyle also need to go.
There is a total failure of leadership. It appears that they are more interested in blaming than fixing the U's problems. This does not bode well for the U long term.
You need a school chancellor like the dynamic Donna Shalala who gets it. She was only at Wisconsin for just over five years. Her leadership turned the Wisconsin football program around.
So you are saying Coyle is putting all his eggs in the PJF basket on the chance he says Yes?
Or he's been dealing with PJF's reps and it's a done deal.
You're giving Coyle way too much credit.
I agree, but one way you climb up as administrators in higher education is by deflecting blame. Higher education is more ruthless than you all realize. No AD or president wants to be seen as 1. subservient to the football coach and 2. not willing to make "hard" decisions.
Claeys if he is fired or quits will be getting a raw deal. The poor guy's mistake was the tweet supporting the boycott. In the world of higher education that was a no-no. Nick Saban and Jim Harbaugh could get away with it, but Claeys can't since Claeys can't point to millions of dollars he has brought in like Nick and Jim. Claeys is in a weak position even with the 9-4 record given the attendance this year and the scandal.
If they come out and retain TC tomorrow they look stupid. If they get rid of Tv and it takes more than 48 hours to name the replacement they look terrible.
Having 24 years experience as a college faculty member I strongly agree with the above. By far the best dean I have worked for was an interim who was within a year or two or retirement and had no interest in advancement or pleasing his superiors. He just did what was right. That type of administrator is a rare breed. Most of the others have spoken in half-truths, and you don't learn the whole truth until the ax has fallen. I have also observed that bad news travels slow. This is not good for Claeys. Best of luck coach, you'll need it.
IMHO, if the U makes Claeys the scapegoat by firing him after three 8/9 win seasons Kaler and Coyle also need to go.
There is a total failure of leadership. It appears that they are more interested in blaming than fixing the U's problems. This does not bode well for the U long term.
You need a school chancellor like the dynamic Donna Shalala who gets it. She was only at Wisconsin for just over five years. Her leadership turned the Wisconsin football program around.
If they fire TC and already have his replacement lined up, they (rightly) look like assholes for deciding to fire their coach and waiting a week+ to tell him and his staff, most of whom have been here for years.
If they fire TC and already have his replacement lined up, they (rightly) look like assholes for deciding to fire their coach and waiting a week+ to tell him and his staff, most of whom have been here for years.
If I'm running a major university I'd rather look like a jerk than a fool.