MadtownGopher
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 9,738
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
Another thing to consider: ISU would gladly take him back if he flamed out in the NBA.
Wonder if a team like the Lakers would make a run at him.
Hoiberg isn't leaving for Minnesota. End of thread.
The Lakers have no players. Their front office is incompetent and not on the same page. Other than money, glamour, prestige, climate...ha...that's presently a horrible job if you want to be successful.
Calapari is the perfect candidate for that job...but the last I heard they already have a coach?
It's the Lakers. You could argue it is the top coaching job on the planet. They have Kobe for a couple of more years, a lot of salary coming off the books, could be getting Melo, and a top lottery pick. You are crazy if you think that wouldn't be more attractive than the ISU job.
It is hard to turn down any job that would literally double your salary.
Would anyone here say no to a position that is a promotion doubling your current pay?
Not saying Fred would take it, but that's a LOT of money. Brad Stevens was a hero in Butler and had no problem jumping to the NBA. Money talks.
I've hear his wife wants their kids to go to school in the TC. If true, that is a big deal.
It's the Lakers. You could argue it is the top coaching job on the planet. They have Kobe for a couple of more years, a lot of salary coming off the books, could be getting Melo, and a top lottery pick. You are crazy if you think that wouldn't be more attractive than the ISU job.
yeah, but if job security is a concern, you don't go there or other big market teams. If you have anything short of the success phil jackson had, people will be calling for your head. Also in the NBA, its different from the college game, where teams are looked at pretty evenly across the board by coaches, thats why you don't see coaches jumping from team to team often like you do at the college game. At the end of the day the lakers have to deal with the same salary cap as the twolves, have to draft from the same pool as the twolves, and what not. Lakers may have a slight advantage in getting free agents, but the players will go where the money is, no matter the market, its only advantage if what they offer a player is equal to or more than what they get at another squad. Indiana, OKC, Spurs are all proof you don't have to be a big market to succeed in the NBA
Haha that is quite the homer post. The Lakers job will always be better than the Timberwolves job, sorry. It doesn't help that K-Love is eyeing an exit and possibly a route to L.A.
Haha that is quite the homer post. The Lakers job will always be better than the Timberwolves job, sorry. It doesn't help that K-Love is eyeing an exit and possibly a route to L.A.
Haha that is quite the homer post. The Lakers job will always be better than the Timberwolves job, sorry. It doesn't help that K-Love is eyeing an exit and possibly a route to L.A.
Not to get to NBA here, but unless the job pressure is a huge concern for a coach, you're exactly right.
The Lakers are worth at least $2 billion. A company with that worth will typically be a pretty good one to work for. The Lakers will spend whatever it takes to win. And that includes for a coaches salary.
You don't take the Twins job over the Yankees one.
Why do people believe this? They can not spent whatever they want, just look at their roster right now, they have a ton of money tied up on Nash and pau and in result can't sign other players, there are salary restrictions for all teams, doesn't matter what the franchise is worth, its not like mlb, if they can spend any money they want they'd have every super star in the NBA
Sent from my LIFE PLAY using Tapatalk
Why do people believe this? They can not spent whatever they want, just look at their roster right now, they have a ton of money tied up on Nash and pau and in result can't sign other players, there are salary restrictions for all teams, doesn't matter what the franchise is worth, its not like mlb, if they can spend any money they want they'd have every super star in the NBA
Sent from my LIFE PLAY using Tapatalk
Yeah, the issue isn't the fact that the Lakers are willing to spend what it takes. The issue is flat out, free agents don't yearn to go to Minnesota. We HAVE to draft our roster, we're not gonna land the max free agents, that's just reality. Lakers land those max free agents. That is what makes that job more appealing. BUT, at the same time, if you draft well, the playing field is pretty level, and it's how the Spurs have done it all these years. They don't land big time free agents, their best players are all their draft picks.
The Wolves can be just as good as any franchise in the NBA, but the way they get there is a bit tougher. With our draft history, it's not hard to see why we've sucked so many years of our existence. It's really that simple.
Hoiberg isn't leaving for Minnesota. End of thread.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Nor do I think would be a good fit. Has never coached in the league. Supposedly Flip helped him get strategies in place at Iowa St., so in that sense he would be an extension of the G.M., but why he leave the absolute security and hero worship in Ames?
Nor do I think would be a good fit. Has never coached in the league. Supposedly Flip helped him get strategies in place at Iowa St., so in that sense he would be an extension of the G.M., but why he leave the absolute security and hero worship in Ames?
Because he's in Ames. 5-6 mill a year for 3 years is absolute security. All you have to do here with the Twolves is make the playoffs and you'd be sainted.
You don't take the Twins job over the Yankees one.
Look. I will happily eat crow, but I don't buy the relationships making him take this job for a second. He can love everybody in the front office. It doesn't mean he would take a job that he is doomed to fail at.