mesothelioma
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 163
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
There will no doubt be a lot written scrutinizing the bracket in the next few days, I noticed this in an SI article
"If you’re looking for a few sleeper picks to reach the Sweet 16, start with UTEP. The Miners defend better than either of their potential second-round foes, Vanderbilt or Murray State — especially inside the arc, where they hold opponents to just 43.3 percent shooting, the 20th-lowest percentage in the country. I like a couple of 6 seeds to make the second weekend, too: Xavier, by beating Minnesota and Pitt; and Marquette, by beating Washington and New Mexico."
http://tourney.si.com/2010/03/15/bracket-musings-selection-sunday-edition/?eref=sihp
"If you’re looking for a few sleeper picks to reach the Sweet 16, start with UTEP. The Miners defend better than either of their potential second-round foes, Vanderbilt or Murray State — especially inside the arc, where they hold opponents to just 43.3 percent shooting, the 20th-lowest percentage in the country. I like a couple of 6 seeds to make the second weekend, too: Xavier, by beating Minnesota and Pitt; and Marquette, by beating Washington and New Mexico."
http://tourney.si.com/2010/03/15/bracket-musings-selection-sunday-edition/?eref=sihp