Those 10 "Lost Points" vs. Purdue

this was my first thought when I read his comment too :LOL:

Morgan would absolutely admit he could have/should have thrown it better, but expecting perfect throws in college just isn't realistic most of the time.

It is hard to make a perfect throw everytime playing catch in the backyard. Reality is that 2 of the 4 INTs that Morgan has thrown this year should not have been INTs and should have been caught by our guys. The one to MBS against Purdue and the one BSF biffed in one of the earlier games.
Look whose rated #1
 



Here is an unpopular opinion.....Morgan needs to throw a better ball to MBS in the end zone, yes it still could have been caught......that ball was back shoulder with a lot of zip on it, essentially behind him coming across the middle. And, insult to injury, it hits his trailing shoulder pad and caroms right in the arms of an opponent.

You're flying in the face of a longtime tradition here on Gopher Hole.

- If the ball hits any part of the receiver it's always considered a drop. If it hits the hands it cost us the game

- Never keep track of the Opponents drops, 'cuz these things never even out

- Same thing with potential interceptions

- Only changes if people hate the QB. Then the pass could have been thrown badly;)

- Gopher "Fans" (read trolls) show-up in droves after a loss and yet we still feed them

Go Gophers! Beat the Illini!
 

Morgan would absolutely admit he could have/should have thrown it better, but expecting perfect throws in college just isn't realistic most of the time.

It is hard to make a perfect throw everytime playing catch in the backyard. Reality is that 2 of the 4 INTs that Morgan has thrown this year should not have been INTs and should have been caught by our guys. The one to MBS against Purdue and the one BSF biffed in one of the earlier games.
The bottom line is a P5 starting wide receiver has to be able to make that catch.
 





Top Bottom