BleedGopher
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 62,867
- Reaction score
- 20,367
- Points
- 113
I will predict that the above mentioned schools will be playing in on campus stadiums within the next 25 years. In Syracuse's case they will tear down the Carrier dome in favor of an open air stadium.
There are plenty of people to hold responsible for the Gophers move to the Metro Dome. As the AD during that period of time, Paul Giel deserves his share of the blame.
I really do not think the move to the dome is the real issue. Memorial stadium was old and needed upgrading. It still was a grand old building that had many great memories. It should never have been torn down. Money should have been allocated to upgrade it while the gophers played at the dome for the eventual return to it. Probably would have saved the tax payers a couple hundred million. I think the nostalgia of the building would have been no less prominent than Williams Arena is today. Sure you give up some things, but you also get other things in return with an old building.
We now can see that teams like Miami (playing in Dolphins Stadium), Pitt (playing in Steelers stadium), and Syracuse (playing in a dome) will not be successful down the road due to the sharing of professional off campus stadiums. They will find over time that kids will chose the college experience over playing close to home. They will find that having a place to call home, to protect and defend goes a longggg ways in the success of the program...
There was another plan for fixing Memorial, it did not include a dome, or anything like that. Two millon dollars in phase one, and another two in phase two. Paul Giel refused to listen to student groups, former teammates, and many community people. The only plan he backed was a pie in the sky pipedream brought to him by Harvey McKay which was this dome idea. Student groups begged to meet with him, he refused, even after the move. Intrested citizen groups were met with a simular cold shoulder. Paul was a great player, and from all I heard a nice man, and a good AD, but to call him blameless in the move is silly, and frankly has other motives. I expect his son to attempt to whitewash all blame, but for people here to sign off without the facts bothers me.
On the family thing, I expressed an idea about bringing family members and living former greats to be honored, and it came half true. I'm just glad that a real effort to bring our history with us was made and am very happy for the most part at how it turned out. We can not ignore the mistakes of the past, but work our hardest to not repeat them.
I’m sure that Paul Giel was a great father and any son would want to highlight the positives of his father’s time on this earth. I get that.
Paul Giel though was an unmitigated disaster as an AD.
I don’t think that he worked very hard at the job and most of his hire decisions were pretty crumby. I really don’t remember what level of leadership he had in the move to the dome, but I damn sure remember he wasn’t against it. If he was pro-Memorial stadium, the fight was his to take up. He didn’t.
The record’s of his teams was never good and got worse the longer he hung around.
He had almost two decades to foster a culture of excellence in athletics at a world-class institution with a proud history. He didn’t.
The wreckage of his tenure haunts UofM athletics to this day.
Your damn right about "revisonist history" and the Strib is engaging in it!
Giel lobbyed at the State Senate to upgrade Memorial Stadium and not just for a Dome. When Minneapolis business leaders, big labor and finally the Administration at the U all decided to go for the HHH Dome, Giel did his job and lobbyed for the Dome. His heart didn't seem in it though.
To blame him now is bull#$it.
Dome plan. He refused to listen to anyone else but
Harvey McKay. I was there, where were you? I was in a group of students who wanted to save the stadium, he refused to see us. I was in a group that tried to stop him from starting to tear down the walls, where were you? We were ignored again. You can try and spin this, but he was front and center and joined Sid in forcing us into the dome. He had made up his mind, we were going to play in some sort of Dome. Case closed. Your defense of him is the only bull#$#it here.
Unbelieveable...
Giel probably traveled this state 50 times over trying to fund raise for the athletic dept. He single handedly revamped the Williams Fund in the 70's and 80's. Austin, Grand Rapids, Blue Earth, Rochester, White Bear, Alexandria, etc.. golf events, speaking... he raised thousands...
coaches Giel hired:
Brooks (3 national championships and an olympic gold medal - legend) Buetow, Woog... ??
Anderson (still coaching - legend)
Robinson (still coaching - national champs - legend)
Musselman/Dutcher/Haskins (you decide? b10 champs - final 4* )
Stoll/Salem/Holtz/Gutekunst (coup to get Holtz and had Bobby Ross to replace him before admin and sid sunk it. gutey got job)
Noyce (multiple big ten champs)
Roethlisburg(multiple b10 champs - legend in college gymnastics)
Dennis Dale (swimming- legend)
No Sports cut under his direction. Few Big Ten schools can say the same during the 70's and 80's.
I could go on, but I am getting tired. He may not have been an elite adminstrator, BUT question his effort, c'mon!!!!!!???????
Over his nearly two decades as AD, I hope he was able to travel the state at least 50 times. Why that’s almost three times a year. Geesh! Sorry, but the athletics’ funds and endowments are barely average for a B10 school. His concentration on getting money from the “swells” did not leave a broadly developed fundraising apparatus that could endure over time.
As to coaching hires, none of his FB coaches had a career winning record at UM, and one of them is a disingenuous sputtering fool. Each of his BB coach hires left the program more of an embarrassment than when he came to it. Mussleman (fights), Dutch – whom I like (crime), Haskins (what 6 years of novated records?).
Amazingly, he was able to get Brooks, Woog and Buetow at the premier hockey school in the country. Really, Mr. Giel can’t take credit for that. I’m sure that you could have gotten those guys to coach at the UofM before breakfast on a bad day.
As to the non-rev sports, Anderson and Dale are awesome indeed, but as the saying goes “the sun even shines on a lazy dog’s ass every once in a while”.
Where it counted, Mr. Giel was pretty pathetic.
I'm curious of your opinion of:
Rick Bay
McKinley Boston
Mark Dienhart
Tom Moe (interim)
Joel Maturi
What's their record in FB, BB and the sports "that count"???
5 AD's in 20 years...
What does that tell you smart guy?? Pretty unstable environment over at Bierman. Is that all on the AD, or does the President, Board of Regents, administration have a little to do with it?
There was another plan for fixing Memorial, it did not include a dome, or anything like that. Two millon dollars in phase one, and another two in phase two. Paul Giel refused to listen to student groups, former teammates, and many community people. The only plan he backed was a pie in the sky pipedream brought to him by Harvey McKay which was this dome idea. Student groups begged to meet with him, he refused, even after the move. Intrested citizen groups were met with a simular cold shoulder. Paul was a great player, and from all I heard a nice man, and a good AD, but to call him blameless in the move is silly, and frankly has other motives. I expect his son to attempt to whitewash all blame, but for people here to sign off without the facts bothers me.
On the family thing, I expressed an idea about bringing family members and living former greats to be honored, and it came half true. I'm just glad that a real effort to bring our history with us was made and am very happy for the most part at how it turned out. We can not ignore the mistakes of the past, but work our hardest to not repeat them.
Not really sure that's a group that I personally would like to be considered my peers (too early to tell about Mr. Maturi). But Mr. Giel seems to fit in with them OK. He just happened to engineer an 18 year run for himself to do the same kind of job it took the others two or three years to get called on the carpet for. Results were about the same though.
If you really believe that Division 1 ADs are hired and make high 6 and 7 figure salarys in order to maintain high quality swimming programs, then I have some very unsettling news for you.
I agree with you on the regents though. They have been absolutely feckless, confused and confusing in . . . . . well just about everything that they do. Mr. Giel had quite a bit more time than the others though to help them help UofM athletics. He just did not do it.