Bronko Nagurski Gopher
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,478
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 36
there is a still image of tubby where you can click to play the video of their (meathead myron medcalf, dennis brackin & kent youngblood) gophers discussion and then right below that it reads in ominous tone: "the troubled history of the U men's athletic teams dominates discussion today."
what in the F does that even mean?! the overly-negative tone of that headline would make a first time observer believe the u of m men's sports teams over their histories have been filled with a bunch of murders, robber barrons and puppy punchers. the discussion also includes u of m hater and grim reaper sports editor dennis brackin (reusse's buddy) so that explains a lot and is probably where this lame headline came from.
it is the way the star tribune and its editors sensationalize stories, headlines, etc. about the u of m which drives me more and more each day to consider giving up reading their gophers coverage altogether. i am just sick of their often biased and outlandish "rile up the most readers approach" as well as the way they often come off as if the u of m is the only sports program in the history of the ncaa (or even the big ten for that matter) who has ever had to deal with violations or player conduct issues when something pops up.
and what will be the response of some of the media-apologists on this board -- likely media members themselves? hey, they are just being objective. it is their job to present the story that way and give it such a headline, blah, blah, blah.
B.S.! give me a frickin' break!
what in the F does that even mean?! the overly-negative tone of that headline would make a first time observer believe the u of m men's sports teams over their histories have been filled with a bunch of murders, robber barrons and puppy punchers. the discussion also includes u of m hater and grim reaper sports editor dennis brackin (reusse's buddy) so that explains a lot and is probably where this lame headline came from.
it is the way the star tribune and its editors sensationalize stories, headlines, etc. about the u of m which drives me more and more each day to consider giving up reading their gophers coverage altogether. i am just sick of their often biased and outlandish "rile up the most readers approach" as well as the way they often come off as if the u of m is the only sports program in the history of the ncaa (or even the big ten for that matter) who has ever had to deal with violations or player conduct issues when something pops up.
and what will be the response of some of the media-apologists on this board -- likely media members themselves? hey, they are just being objective. it is their job to present the story that way and give it such a headline, blah, blah, blah.
B.S.! give me a frickin' break!