In the news conference the other day Tresel claimed he kept quiet because (1). he was scared for his players (2) his players were involved in a federal drug case (3). he was supposed to keep everything quiet because it was an on-going case. (These are my interpretations of what he said or was implying.)
However, if you read the first email on April 2, the lawyer was simply giving him a heads up that some cop friends of his told him that they found OSU memorabilia in the raid and that it probably came from some players. It in no way linked the players to the case. More importantly, there was no request for confidentiality.
In a second email about two weeks later, the lawyer supplied more details about the items found and mentioned several players names, but there again was nothing connecting the players to the case other than they had obviously sold the stuff to the man in exchange for money or tatoos. The lawyer asked for the email to be kept confidential - apparently because he was breaking his confidentiality with the suspect.
In June the lawyer even sent Tressel a picture of the guy so Tressel could show it to the players involved and warn them to stay away from the guy, so the lawyer obviously expected something to be done with the information he was supplying.
Seems to me Tressel is still having problems with the truth, and I can't figure out why the national media is him letting get by with it.
Link (bottom of page): http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/extras/2011/tresselviolation/index.html
However, if you read the first email on April 2, the lawyer was simply giving him a heads up that some cop friends of his told him that they found OSU memorabilia in the raid and that it probably came from some players. It in no way linked the players to the case. More importantly, there was no request for confidentiality.
In a second email about two weeks later, the lawyer supplied more details about the items found and mentioned several players names, but there again was nothing connecting the players to the case other than they had obviously sold the stuff to the man in exchange for money or tatoos. The lawyer asked for the email to be kept confidential - apparently because he was breaking his confidentiality with the suspect.
In June the lawyer even sent Tressel a picture of the guy so Tressel could show it to the players involved and warn them to stay away from the guy, so the lawyer obviously expected something to be done with the information he was supplying.
Seems to me Tressel is still having problems with the truth, and I can't figure out why the national media is him letting get by with it.
Link (bottom of page): http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/extras/2011/tresselviolation/index.html