gopherbadgerman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,235
- Reaction score
- 2,452
- Points
- 113
Then we should have a pretty good season!I don't have a concern with any of these.
Then we should have a pretty good season!I don't have a concern with any of these.
Which means muchOn offense it is a conservative approach, grinding it out and eating up the clock.
Which means much of the time you know, I know, and the opposing coaches and players know what’s coming.On offense it is a conservative approach, grinding it out and eating up the clock.
And many have not been able to stop it.Which means much
Which means much of the time you know, I know, and the opposing coaches and players know what’s coming.
Very true with Mo and a great line. When your personnel changes it’s smart to run what they do best, not what they don’t do well unless you are Navy running the same attack when ND is up 42-0.And many have not been able to stop it.
Why would you shy away from putting a bigger load on one of the elite defenses in the country?
I know what you’re saying. I’m suggesting the luxury of a great defense is that you don’t need to be a slave to ball control. You can play higher risk/reward at times against better teams knowing the defense is there behind you.I'm not suggesting that the defense can't handle an additional workload. But - if the defense is on the field for more snaps, that does test the defensive depth - which was impacted by portal losses.
the more the other team's offense is on the field, the more opportunities they have to make plays and score points. especially if the defense is a little more tired in the 4th quarter. that's all I'm saying.
That's my biggest hope, that they let him loose.My biggest concern is the AK is give the green light to sling it