NoelarBear
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2019
- Messages
- 528
- Reaction score
- 1,527
- Points
- 93
I've seen/ heard this a lot about this year's draft. I also heard (can't remember from who/ where, maybe Jeff Goodman?) that after the first 20 picks or so, it returned to a more normal draft. I don't follow the draft that closely (this year or in any year), anyone else have any opinions on this? Because if the last 2/3 of the draft (where Christie was always rumored to go) were "normal" talent wise, the first 1/3 being historically week shouldn't have really made much of a difference for him.concensus weak draft this year.
Just going by what the consensus is from the guys who follow this...next year is loaded.I've seen/ heard this a lot about this year's draft. I also heard (can't remember from who/ where, maybe Jeff Goodman?) that after the first 20 picks or so, it returned to a more normal draft. I don't follow the draft that closely (this year or in any year), anyone else have any opinions on this? Because if the last 2/3 of the draft (where Christie was always rumored to go) were "normal" talent wise, the first 1/3 being historically week shouldn't have really made much of a difference for him.
He could have waited until next year but with greater analysis time maybe his "potential" would have been perceived less. Easily could have been more too but there are no guarantees.
Rodney Williams....Based on what I have seen over the years from players listed in mock drafts as underclassmen, more often than not, the longer you stay the less you are valued. There are numerous exceptions including Zach Edey but Edey's best showcase was his final year.
I'd say Christie's situation was 50/50.
This is 100% correct. The NBA really does hold age against a recruit - and they should.Based on what I have seen over the years from players listed in mock drafts as underclassmen, more often than not, the longer you stay the less you are valued. There are numerous exceptions including Zach Edey but Edey's best showcase was his final year.
I'd say Christie's situation was 50/50.
If the top end wasn't weak, a lot of the players drafted ahead of Cam would have been drafted later likely pushing him out of the draft. It doesn't matter if the players around him are in the normal range...the Top 20 would have mostly been drafted farther down pushing Cam's group closer to being draft day signings.I've seen/ heard this a lot about this year's draft. I also heard (can't remember from who/ where, maybe Jeff Goodman?) that after the first 20 picks or so, it returned to a more normal draft. I don't follow the draft that closely (this year or in any year), anyone else have any opinions on this? Because if the last 2/3 of the draft (where Christie was always rumored to go) were "normal" talent wise, the first 1/3 being historically week shouldn't have really made much of a difference for him.
It's easy to play Monday morning QB. But based on what we knew prior to the draft (what scouts were saying and where he was likely to get drafted), it was still the right call then.All those here who were advocating for Cam to leave for the draft...saying it was a no-brainer...do you still feel that way?
At least it wouldn't have mattered anyway, with him entered into the transfer portal.
Clippers invest in their young guys too. Look how they've treated coffeyIf the top end wasn't weak, a lot of the players drafted ahead of Cam would have been drafted later likely pushing him out of the draft. It doesn't matter if the players around him are in the normal range...the Top 20 would have mostly been drafted farther down pushing Cam's group closer to being draft day signings.
He made the right decision.