Texas Tech transfer quarterback Brendan Sorsby is checking into a residential treatment program for a gambling addiction.

I'm not sure this isn't a good thing for him anyways. Take a year off, show NFL teams you've gotten your life together, and then his opportunities might open up a lot more the following year.
And in the meantime DraftKings can put him on the payroll to keep him afloat. NFL would probably be OK with that.
 

And in the meantime DraftKings can put him on the payroll to keep him afloat. NFL would probably be OK with that.
He could reprise the old Sy Sperling Hair Club for Men ads. Younger posters won't remember Sy's ubiquitous television ads in the 1970s and 1980s in which he would say "Not only am I the Hair Club President, but I'm also a client."
 

 

Word is Paul Crewe is about to retire so he might get an opportunity to play for Mean Machine.
 

It's too bad Jimmy Swaggert has left the mortal coil. He could have counseled Sorsby on the art of the tear-soaked over-the-top public apology in order to regain his previous standing.

Jimmy Swaggert.jpeg
 
Last edited:




Don't you have to be an NFL player to be part of the NFLPA??? I plan on suing as well if that's not the case
IF not holding a supplemental draft is a violation of the CBA that the NFL and NFLPA have negotiated, then Sorsby being a member or not is irrelevant.
 




But I don't see anything about any suit filing going through yesterday, so it's probably too late.

Sorsby may have just decided to take his punishment and sit out of football this fall.
 

One extra post here for no good reason, other than to piss in the cereal of the posters who have this fake thing of being pissed off when someone makes a bunch of posts in a row.

:ROFLMAO:
 


Hopefully he isn't able to win any of his appeals or whatever. Will help get the message across to other players that gambling will be taken seriously and can seriously impact their future in the game.

In a time when there are seemingly so few rules it is good that at least one of them seems to be holding in terms of not being allowed to bet on sports as an athlete.
 



Show his this commercial and tell him that being a good athlete doesn’t guarantee him an NFL roster spot

You have your degree after 4 years, right?

Good luck!

 

The thing very, very, very clearly is: if there had been a supplemental draft, then a team would've taken him.

The NFL knew that, and therefore shut it down from the league office on purpose.

That might well be a violation of the CBA. Let's see if anything happens. Problem with that is, why didn't Kessler file that suit even back on Wednesday? Now he didn't even file by Friday. Makes it unlikely, is what I read.

Because they would need an immediate, emergency decision from a judge to issue some kind of decision ... but then the judge can say "if this is such an emergency, why did you take so long to file??"
 

Hot take; the nfl is ridiculous- stallworth killed someone and missed the same amount of time.

There is also a lot we are not privy to in this case, and I would be interested to know the exact details of his betting behavior. In particular, what led the judge to rule the initial injunction (as part of the decision, he indicated that he had a chance to win the case).

Most of what is discussed seems to be his behavior at Indiana while a red shirt (agreed that it bad to bet on your team, but he had no material impact on the games in which he did bet). It also looks like he stopped betting with games involving Indiana two weeks before he saw the field. There also seems to be no indication that he bet on Cincy at all while playing.

ESPN article describing Indiana betting behavior.
 

Hot take; the nfl is ridiculous- stallworth killed someone and missed the same amount of time.

There is also a lot we are not privy to in this case, and I would be interested to know the exact details of his betting behavior. In particular, what led the judge to rule the initial injunction (as part of the decision, he indicated that he had a chance to win the case).

Most of what is discussed seems to be his behavior at Indiana while a red shirt (agreed that it bad to bet on your team, but he had no material impact on the games in which he did bet). It also looks like he stopped betting with games involving Indiana two weeks before he saw the field. There also seems to be no indication that he bet on Cincy at all while playing.

ESPN article describing Indiana betting behavior.
So is your stance that college and pro athletes should be allowed to bet on games?
 

So is your stance that college and pro athletes should be allowed to bet on games?
No, I said it was bad. This situation in particular seems to be much different compared to other high profile cases (terry rozier for example) given he never bet on games he played in.

I would have guessed that the punishment here would be similar to those faced by the football player in 2024 at UT Austin instead of the complete black balling by the ncaa, nfl and cfl.
 




Top Bottom