SDSU won 43-7 over So Utah
Fresno St 34-20 over Sacramento St. who is now 2-2.
Georgia Southern did not play
Georgia State lost in multiple overtimes at Texas State
Georgia beat Notre Dame
Georgia State lost in multiple overtimes at Texas State
AH...good catch. Correction:
Georgia Southern lost in multiple overtimes at Texas State.
AH...good catch. Correction:
Georgia Southern lost in multiple overtimes at Texas State.
That was Georgia State. The team we played last week, Georgia Southern, did not play this week.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not a single post about how good Sacramento State is? This site is getting lazy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not a single post about how good Sacramento State is? This site is getting lazy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It means all 3 teams won ten games last year and are championship teams.. right?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of all the nonsense PJ says, that line is up at the top. St. John’s won 12 games last year and were champions. Guess they “know how to win” as well. Lucky we don’t have to play them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Naw, culture, habits, what a team will accept absolutely makes a difference in teams.
Some teams are definitely easier to beat than others based on who they are. PJ’s observations are valid. I agree with him.
Some teams are comfortable losing, it becomes a habit.
All three of our opponents were well coached and used to winning...<b>hence harder to beat.</b>
Bowling Green? Rutgers? to name twoHarder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Harder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don’t think it is harder to beat people who are accustomed to winning and have developed decent habits than teams who have grown accustomed to losing and have developed habits of finding ways to lose?
Do you think winning and losing is random?
Do you thinking winning and losing is based purely off talent ratings?
I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing Spoofin. What are you arguing?
You don’t think it is harder to beat people who are accustomed to winning and have developed decent habits than teams who have grown accustomed to losing and have developed habits of finding ways to lose?
Do you think winning and losing is random?
Do you thinking winning and losing is based purely off talent ratings?
I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing Spoofin. What are you arguing?
I think it would be easier for us to beat St. Johns than it would be for us to beat Rutgers.
Of all the nonsense PJ says, that line is up at the top. St. John’s won 12 games last year and were champions. Guess they “know how to win” as well. Lucky we don’t have to play them.
Harder than who? Bottom Tier Sun Belt Teams?
Sure, and Eden Prairie would be easier than St Johns. But, I don’t think dragging in the absurd has anything to do with discounting PJs comments about the programs we actually did play.
PJ's pulled this debate into the absurd. He called GSU a championship caliber team. That's absurd.
PJ's pulled this debate into the absurd. He called GSU a championship caliber team. That's absurd.
GSU finished 3rd in their conference last year, 1 game out of first. That's now considered bottom tier? More nonsense from you.
Now you're trying to compare Division I teams to Division III teams? Speaking of nonsense...
This is going to be a long thread when he have 14 teams to talk about, in it...