Click on the link below to read Jeffrick's article at TDG.
http://www.thedailygopher.com/2014/4/18/5621194/minnesota-football
http://www.thedailygopher.com/2014/4/18/5621194/minnesota-football
The INT was a pass where he had sophomore Drew Wolitarksy wide open on a deep post, but the ball was underthrown so badly DB Jalen Myrick had time to recover and pick off the pass.
Maybe I saw something different, but wasn't the pass just thrown slightly behind Wolitarsky? And if anything, a little overthrown instead of underthrown? Plus, Myrick made a great catch on the play, not exactly a simple "recovery."
Maybe I saw something different, but wasn't the pass just thrown slightly behind Wolitarsky? And if anything, a little overthrown instead of underthrown? Plus, Myrick made a great catch on the play, not exactly a simple "recovery."
All correct except for the "slightly" part. Should have been 6 pts, but the pass was bad.
The demise of this staff will be the QB position; can't recruit one and/or develop one. There isn't a good QB on the roster right now, so it will be years before we can see improvement at the position. They keep recruiting "athletic" QBs, I'd like to see us bring one in that is actually known for passing the ball. This is big boy football, you have to be able to do it all at the position; the coaches have yet to realize this.
It all starts with the offensive line.
Shortell could yet he transferred and didn't fit the system.
The demise of this staff will be the QB position; can't recruit one and/or develop one. There isn't a good QB on the roster right now, so it will be years before we can see improvement at the position. They keep recruiting "athletic" QBs, I'd like to see us bring one in that is actually known for passing the ball. This is big boy football, you have to be able to do it all at the position; the coaches have yet to realize this.
Mitch didn't light it up at the spring game...oh no.
Agree with everything but might suggest hardly a game and more of a somewhat meaningless controlled scrimmage. Anyway if Mitch had thrown a few touchdown passes, the naysayers would be bitching about the defense. You can't win with these the sky is falling types.
I was at the Spring game and watched the Spring Game back last night. Gaard and Fuller both commented how much better Leidner looked in practice versus last year. I said this in another thread, but I'd love to see how expectations would be different had Wolitarsky caught the ball against Syracuse rather than letting it slip through his hands. If you're looking for Peyton Manning throwing the ball all over the field, you're going to be S.O.L. A QB's best friends are a solid running game and reliable safety valves. The TEs on this roster are going to make Mitch look really good by the end of the season.I like Jeffrick's writing but he said it himself, he didn't go to a single spring practice and only watched the spring game on tv. The majority of reviews I've seen of Leidner from people who actually went to spring practice have been pretty positive and have said he looks sharp. The spring "game" was one day, one scrimmage. IMO, the pass protection was just as liable for the mediocre performance from our passing attack during the spring game. Other than the Wolitarsky play, I don't remember a pass from Leidner that was bad even though he had a clean pocket. I said it last year and I'll say it again now, the QB position is not the only reason our passing game has struggled. The O-Line and WR's need to improve too, the QB position has taken way too much of the blame.
I was at the Spring game and watched the Spring Game back last night. Gaard and Fuller both commented how much better Leidner looked in practice versus last year. I said this in another thread, but I'd love to see how expectations would be different had Wolitarsky caught the ball against Syracuse rather than letting it slip through his hands. If you're looking for Peyton Manning throwing the ball all over the field, you're going to be S.O.L. A QB's best friends are a solid running game and reliable safety valves. The TEs on this roster are going to make Mitch look really good by the end of the season.
You know everything is not an anecdote. You have to discriminate. You choose things that are funny or mildly amusing or interesting. You're a miracle! Your stories have NONE of that. They're not even amusing ACCIDENTALLY! "Honey, I'd like you to meet wren/imawalrus, he's got some amusing anecodotes for you. Oh and here's a gun so you can blow your brains out. You'll thank me for it." I could tolerate any insurance seminar. For days I could sit there and listen to them go on and on with a big smile on my face. They'd say, "How can you stand it?" I'd say, "'Cause I've been with wren/imawalrus. I can take ANYTHING." You know what they'd say? They'd say, "I know what you mean. The shower curtain ring guy. Woah." It's like going on a date with a Chatty Cathy doll. I expect you have a little string on your chest, you know, that I pull out and have to snap back. Except I wouldn't pull it out and snap it back - you would. Agh! Agh! Agh! Agh! And by the way, you know, when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea - have a POINT. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!
Thanks for your insight! You have given me new hope that it is possible to survive his posts.
Here are the Cliff Notes for his posts.
Big Ten wins matter. :0)