Johnnyboy18
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,828
- Reaction score
- 1,850
- Points
- 113
I think Minnesota vs WMU would of been a good match up last year.
I don't see why it matters why it works on kids and not adults. Who cares? He's coaching kids, let him coach to the kids. He's got 4, maybe 5 years with them, not 10 or 20, less chance for them to get "worn out". I'm all for a wait and see approach, completely cool with that. What I get tired of, and think is counterproductive is when fans come on here just to be skeptical about his methods right now.
Another thing I find interesting is virtually everything I've read or seen on TV regarding the Fleck hire is positive, when coming from people other than Minnesotans or local media. You start getting closer to the Twin Cities, and it becomes more negative.
If he's a clown, he's our clown. If he wins, we'll love his shtick. If Brewster had taken us to the Rose Bowl, that Rose Bowl turf would have become a sacred relic. If it motivates the players, that's what matters.
Oh yeah? Where did he say that?
Would love to see what Gopher WR he thinks will be drafted in the top 10 next year, which OL will be drafted in rounds 3 or 4, and which starting QB could also be a late round pick? All things he had at Western Michigan this year.
Could have been clearer, I didn't mean to infer he did...that's my observation. I explained why in response to a subsequent post. In a vast majority of players, college talent does not mean NFL talent. Having said that, at last count WMU have 7 players in the NFL, two from Fleck's time period. Gophs have 13, 11 from the same time period.
Here's the thing:
If IA or WI hired a new coach - let's call him "J.P Flack" - and "JP Flack" was giving motivational speeches about sharks and farmers - I am 100% certain that this board would be ridiculing "JP Flack" and calling him a circus clown - or less complimentary terms.
Look - Fleck is not my cup of tea. OK. I'll live with it. I just hope the Fleck acolytes can accept or understand that not everyone is going to buy into Fleck's style or approach. But, in the end, he will be judged on results. he may turn out to be a good recruiter at this level - but we won't know that for 2 or 3 years, until he's had time to go through a couple of recruiting cycles, and those players start showing up on the field.
You are probably right on the 13-0 prediction.
Considering OSU is only team in Big Ten to ever win 13 or more games.
Since 1973 when they started playing 12 games, Michigan has won 12 games once, Penn State twice, and OSU, 7 times.
In the last 15 years here are the 12 game winners:
MSU 2
Iowa 1
WI 1
OSU 7
Michigan has 1 unbeaten/untied season in 60+ years
OSU has 4
Penn State has 5
So you're right, chances are slim.
Taking care of the ball is huge in Fleck world. It requires concentration. If the Gophers had taken care of the ball last season they might have been undefeated. Fleck stresses concentration in everything and seeing Kiondre Thomas draw a blank the first time he was asked, and then coming up with all the answers the 2nd time shows this paying off."
I remember last year at this time reading stories about how Jay Johnson was giving quizzes to the kids to make sure they were grasping material, about Johnson talking ball security...all coaches preach ball security, all coaches preach concentration. Gophers are actually very good at it, ranked 18th in nation in turnover margin. Gophers fumbled it five times all last year, WMU fumbled it four. The backs and rcvrs know how how to hang on. Terrell threw 4 picks; Mitch threw 12...if Ciarrocca can implement a nice ball control, short passing game and teach a guy how to make decisive decisions, we are gravy.
I will get hammered for this, but even as an 18 yr old this would just wear me out. I'm sure as some have mentioned above, there will be some current players that just go along to get along. I sure hope he wins, but it just seems so sales seminar or televangelist or something. I continue to take a wait and see approach, I just don't think it's going to work, but will be the first to admit I'm wrong if it does.
I find myself really torn on Fleck's methods. I hear the people that kind of roll their eyes at all the rah rah stuff, but I also think if I was an 18-year old football player it might work well as a motivational tool. The bottom line though is if it makes the players respond, it doesn't really matter if it works on me or not. I'd be curious to hear from some of our younger posters what they think of Fleck.
People want to succeed. Players want to get better on the field, in the classroom. Fleck is unique in that he is laying out an approach that goes beyond the football field to success and fulfillment in life in general.
I can see how this is very appealing, especially in the realm of football. J Robinson not that much different with the wrestling program.
J Robinson [WAS] not that much different with the wrestling program.
I agree with your first two sentences, but not the third.
PJF is not unique in his approach of taking it beyond the football field. Many successful programs do the same things. The past two years on BTN they showed OSU and MSU during the preseason and both programs did things like what PJF has talked about. Not anything new here. What PJF brings is a different more enthusiastic approach to it all.
Why do we act like this is different then every other coaching change. They all promote the "new sheriff in town". All this "culture change" BS is tiresome. Practice hard, play hard, win games.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Because he's a lot different than pretty much every other coach?
Not really. He talks in his own coach speak just like every other coach. He might be better at promoting his "brand" than some others in the BIG West.
I've been around a lot of coaches and that's not coach speak. To argue he's like pretty much every other coach is pretty insane. Not saying that's a good or bad thing
Im 22 and a former college athlete. If i was going through my visits and seen a coach like Fleck i would have been sold pretty quick. Whenever he talks he brings out that fire inside, and also sounds very genuine. I know my friends and I really like Fleck. It would be refreshing seeing your coach sprinting down the sidelines or putting the pads on. Shows me that he's willing to do anything for the players.
Hearing players that played for Kill/Claeys say that it's completely different.Why do we act like this is different then every other coaching change. They all promote the "new sheriff in town". All this "culture change" BS is tiresome. Practice hard, play hard, win games.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hearing players that played for Kill/Claeys say that it's completely different.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
I've been around a lot of coaches and that's not coach speak. To argue he's like pretty much every other coach is pretty insane. Not saying that's a good or bad thing
So in the meantime, are you (a general "you") going to take the optimistic view and think he'll get there in those two or three years or stay pessimistic because "he's just another Brewster" and we're in for a living hell until he crashes and burns?
I don't think I'm being pessimistic. I think I'm being realistic. I've seen a lot of new coaches come into the U of M program. there was at least some degree of excitement for most of them. Some of them produced good teams - some of them produced bad teams. All I'm saying is I want to wait and see what Fleck's team looks like ON THE FIELD before I form an opinion about what type of coach he's going to be at this level.