Gophergrandpa
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2018
- Messages
- 4,308
- Reaction score
- 5,377
- Points
- 113
Now we agree. We had a great rushing attack in 2019 and ran more than 55% of the time. But our passing attack produced significantly more yardage and many more TDs than the run game. It was a balanced, dangerous offense that placed lots of stress on opposing defenses. But that is gone now.Yeah that is my point. I guess I didn’t word it well. Can we beat good teams by being hyper conservative? I personally don’t think so, unless we recruit better. We were able to have success with passing against good teams, but they were still overall run oriented. Having stud receivers helps. I liked the run heavy but still could pass of 2019. Don’t like what I’ve seen the last 3 years and don’t think the Gophers can win against better teams being ultra conservative. I think they need to get that passing game more up to par, some how, some way. Easier said than done.
I think SON or somebody already said it but, with very high run orientation (predictable offense; lack of explosive plays) we can beat teams that we can physically overpower; and we can win toss-up games where we get ahead meaningfully and play excellent defense. (Don’t play good defense, however, and you get a Northwestern debacle). But we lose toss-up games where we fall behind by more than 10 points, and we are destined to get our ears boxed by highly-talented teams who play with resolve. That is our ceiling with PJ’s current heavy run bias offensive style.
Now, with PJ’s style (abandon pass game early in season, if cracks show up), we still get a decent number of wins, which most fans like. And we might actually get more wins in a run-oriented scheme than if we passed a lot, but futilely. But the football is atavistic and often boring. And our passing attack, rusting away in the corner, simply won’t be there to work a miracle when we suddenly need it—when we are well behind in the second half. That’s my severely under-informed opinion, anyway!