STrib Editorial Board: A handful of conscientious college programs are requiring vaccination or a negative test. The Gophers should do the same.

BleedGopher

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
60,865
Reaction score
16,402
Points
113
per the STrib Editorial Board:

The best time to strengthen a college football team's defense is before — not after — the opponent carries the pigskin into the end zone.

The same principle applies to the battle against COVID-19. The pathogen's dangerously transmissible delta variant is overwhelming hospitals across the southern United States. Why wait until that crisis comes to Minnesota before putting the strongest possible preventive measures in place, particularly where crowds congregate?

That's why the lackluster COVID policies in place for Thursday night's University of Minnesota home opener against Ohio State induce frustration. With the daily average hospitalizations now topping 100,000 nationally, a small but conscientious group of universities are requiring football fans to show proof of vaccination or a negative COVID test before entering stadiums.

The U, with its world-class academic health center and school of public health, should be among the institutions setting the standard for COVID safeguards. Unfortunately, the university is lagging, not leading, though it still has time to correct course this season.

A week ago, Louisiana State University (LSU) became one of the latest universities to announce it will require vaccination proof or a negative test on game day. "While we are aware of the diverse perspectives across the nation regarding masks and vaccinations, we must take all reasonable measures to protect our campus and community," LSU President William F. Tate IV said in the announcement.

LSU joins the University of Oregon, Oregon State and Tulane University in enacting these protections, according to the Associated Press.

Regrettably, COVID cases and hospitalizations have risen in Minnesota as the summer wears on. While the uptick is not as severe as the state's December and January surge, it nevertheless requires responsible policies to halt further spread.

Requiring proof of vaccination or a negative test at Gophers games would help. It would provide an incentive for some vaccine holdouts to get the shots. In addition, it's a sensible precaution in a stadium setting.

Being outdoors is "very helpful in preventing COVID spread, but it's not perfect,' said Dr. Dimitri Drekonja, an infectious disease expert at the U. "And football games are the type of outdoor activities we'd worry about."

Reasons why include close proximity, with many of the 50,000 fans being shoulder to shoulder for several hours, lots of yelling/cheering creating aerosolized particles, as well as associated indoor gatherings and the use of restrooms and transit.

Drekonja, an outspoken advocate for mandating student vaccinations at the U, said he's "100% in favor" of putting in place the same requirements as LSU and the other schools.

In response to an editorial writer's query, U officials noted that masks are required of fans indoors at Huntington Bank Stadium, and "strongly encouraged" when they are outdoors.

Paul Rovnak, senior associate athletic director-communications, said that Gopher Athletics is following the U's campus guidelines. He noted that Minnesota is currently in "a different spot with COVID" than Louisiana, and added that few college programs are requiring vaccinations/negative tests for fans.

In addition, Rovnak said he is not aware of any Minnesota professional sports teams that are requiring vaccination/negative tests in their home stadiums.

Rovnak is accurate when he points out the difference in the two states' COVID metrics. Louisiana currently has 58 cases per 100,000 population, according to the New York Times. Minnesota is at 28 cases per 100,000.

But the pandemic has shown how quickly the numbers can change. Preventing spread requires proactive measures, such as strong safeguards in football stadiums and other venues. Right now, only a few collegiate programs have tough requirements like LSU's, but delta's threat means that's likely to change. Why not get out in front of this?

The U is also a public institution that should provide leadership on public health issues and set an example for private businesses — including professional sports teams.

It's an outrage that some regional programs don't have a choice when it comes to COVID safeguards for football games or other activities. A University of Iowa spokesman pointed out that state law prohibits Iowa's public universities from requiring proof of vaccination.

Thankfully, the U does not face such an irresponsible limitation in Minnesota. It has a chance to put the best possible preventive measures in place and should do so.


Go Gophers!!
 


We are over a year into the pandemic. Pretty hard not to make an informed or uninformed opinion about one's various risks from potential sources of infection at this point.

That also goes for the risk of being around someone with an asymptomatic case too...

The disease is here. We know everyone will be moved out of the stands for at least 30 minutes from a lightning strike 15 miles away.

Really, which is more likely? Let's play some football.
 

What about for kids?

Be kinda a pain to get my kids tested for every game...
How old are they? The policies at LSU, Oregon and Oregon State, for example, only require the vaccine or negative test for kids old enough to get vaccinated (i.e., 12 and up).
 

How old are they? The policies at LSU, Oregon and Oregon State, for example, only require the vaccine or negative test for kids old enough to get vaccinated (i.e., 12 and up).
Yeah they'd qualify as not needing a test.

That seems reasonable. I'd get them vaccinated if I could .. but can't yet.
 


U football just following state fair.
Maybe I missed the editorial about the state (I don’t mean that tongue in cheek).

Also may have missed where Star Tribune is requiring vaccinations of its staff.
 


Are we ever going to acknowledge that people who already had COVID are 6.7x less likely to transmit Delta than a vaccinated person? No?
Vaccination records are probabbly easier than "hey you got a postivie test result" in terms of just making a determination ... let alone false positives and so forth.
 

Vaccination records are probabbly easier than "hey you got a postivie test result" in terms of just making a determination ... let alone false positives and so forth.
I got a vaccine because I hadn’t had the COVID, but my family all has antibodies (which some have been donating since March 2020). They are still being ostracized by these edicts.
 



Yeah they'd qualify as not needing a test.

That seems reasonable. I'd get them vaccinated if I could .. but can't yet.
You can, actually. It’s called “off label” and it is 100% legal.

You ask your doctor for a prescription for the vaccine for you kid, and then it is legal for you to decide to give it to them, even though it is not yet approved.

It will be approved and rolled out for 5-12 year olds, within a matter of a few more months. So, does it really matter if they get it now or in a few months?

I leave it your judgement and risk tolerance as a parent, to make the correct decision for your family.
 


I got a vaccine because I hadn’t had the COVID, but my family all has antibodies (which some have been donating since March 2020). They are still being ostracized by these edicts.
"ostracized"

About a policy that doesn't exist at the bank?

If the rule did exist, same rules apply to them as me ... they can get a vaccine, or not.
 
Last edited:

I would have expected some type of vaccine requirement. But it would be difficult now since season tickets have already been sold, etc.
 






On one hand, I don't want the U to light a match to our fickle and fragile home attendance. I have a feeling this policy, if implemented, might make for a few thousand no-shows for one reason or another.

As a fan, I would have no problem showing my card at the gate. It would be like old times showing a paper ticket :)
 

total speculation - but I suspect the U of MN just didn't want to deal with the hassles of a vaccine or test requirement for attendance at games.

given the current state of affairs, it would have likely wound up with some poor ticket-taker getting screamed at by someone asserting their "right" to attend a football game, while a line of fans shoot video of the confrontation.

my gut says the U considered that scenario, and just said "bleep it."
 

total speculation - but I suspect the U of MN just didn't want to deal with the hassles of a vaccine or test requirement for attendance at games.

given the current state of affairs, it would have likely wound up with some poor ticket-taker getting screamed at by someone asserting their "right" to attend a football game, while a line of fans shoot video of the confrontation.

my gut says the U considered that scenario, and just said "bleep it."
They weren't even requiring the vaccine for students until later ... so yeah a policy / process for verification would be asking a A LOT at the last minute.


Other places like CA already have apps and processes so its easy for them.


And yet other places ... not really sure they're actually checking anything.
 
Last edited:


Are we ever going to acknowledge that people who already had COVID are 6.7x less likely to transmit Delta than a vaccinated person? No?
I would like to see the reference for journal article that reprted that data.
 

Are we ever going to acknowledge that people who already had COVID are 6.7x less likely to transmit Delta than a vaccinated person? No?
Ok, so proof of the antigen test or whatever it's called to show you still have the antibodies? And the test has to have been in the last two weeks, so you can take a handful of them throughout the season. Sound fair?
 

Libertarian and Trumpers' reasons aside , losing key players who become ill or just test positive would make any rational coach require proof of vaccination before the players enter the locker room.
 

total speculation - but I suspect the U of MN just didn't want to deal with the hassles of a vaccine or test requirement for attendance at games.

given the current state of affairs, it would have likely wound up with some poor ticket-taker getting screamed at by someone asserting their "right" to attend a football game, while a line of fans shoot video of the confrontation.

my gut says the U considered that scenario, and just said "bleep it."
Funny, and probably true. And said person would have been working up the argument in their minds the entire time they are driving to the stadium and waiting in line, so they're ready to explode right when the confrontation begins.
 

There are far more factors in play for the Israeli data than the simple picture you’re wanting it to be.

Furthermore, it does not backup your claim that vaccinated are more likely to infect someone else than recovered.
Yeah, all it's doing is comparing previously infected people to vaccinated people, while leaving out unvaccinated altogether.

People making up their minds first and then searching for verification is the problemo here.
 

Libertarian and Trumpers' reasons aside , losing key players who become ill or just test positive would make any rational coach require proof of vaccination before the players enter the locker room.
If I was a player, I wouldn't want to be the reason we lost a game because of covid issues.
 


Ok, so proof of the antigen test or whatever it's called to show you still have the antibodies? And the test has to have been in the last two weeks, so you can take a handful of them throughout the season. Sound fair?
Parents are still donating them 18 months post infection…
 






Top Bottom