STATEMENT ON THE 2021-22 BIG TEN CONFERENCE COVID-19 FORFEITURE POLICY Per Big 10

GopherLady

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
9,285
Reaction score
830
Points
113
ROSEMONT, Ill. – In collaboration and communication with the Big Ten Conference Administrators Council, Chancellors and Presidents, and the Sports Medicine Committee – effective today – the Big Ten Conference has updated its forfeiture policy for remaining 2021-22 conference contests across all sponsored sports.

“The conference office and all 14 Big Ten member institutions have been in continuous contact about developments related to COVID-19,” said Big Ten Conference Commissioner Kevin Warren. “The well-being of our student-athletes and our entire athletic communities is our top priority and we are updating our forfeiture policy to support their health and safety as well as the integrity of conference competition.”

If a team or teams is/are unable to participate in a scheduled Conference competition due to COVID-19, and as a result the competition is unable to occur on the calendar day on which it is scheduled, the competition will not automatically be considered a forfeiture. Upon review and approval by the Conference office, in consultation with the participating institutions and the Big Ten Chief Medical Officer, Dr. James Borchers, the competition may be rescheduled, or declared a no contest or a forfeiture. The Conference office will be responsible for rescheduling any conference competition postponed due to COVID-19.

The number of competitors available – i.e. seven scholarship student-athletes for women’s and men’s basketball – and the availability of at least one countable coach will be factored into the decision-making process. A team that is below the number may still decide to compete if deemed safe by appropriate medical personnel (i.e. the decision to postpone a competition will not be automatic even if a team is below the number).

Conversely, a team that is not below the number of requisite competitors and a coach may still determine that it is unsafe to compete. In such case, forfeiture will not be automatic, but an institution would need to demonstrate to the Conference office, including the Chief Medical Officer, the circumstances that have led to a determination that it would be unsafe to compete. A team that does not compete, and is unable to demonstrate why it is unsafe to compete, will be assessed a forfeiture. Postponed competitions that do not result in forfeiture but are unable to be rescheduled will be declared “no contests.”
 



This doesn’t really discuss proactive rescheduling. As in the @SelectionSunday idea of swapping Minnesota and Nebraska’s opponents this week. It only talks about rescheduling games postponed due to COVID which makes me think they won’t proactively reschedule.
 

left unsaid: the TV networks will tell us what games they want re-scheduled and what time slots they want filled.

in other words - an Illinois vs Michigan game is more likely to be made up as opposed to a MN vs Northwestern game.
 


left unsaid: the TV networks will tell us what games they want re-scheduled and what time slots they want filled.

in other words - an Illinois vs Michigan game is more likely to be made up as opposed to a MN vs Northwestern game.
Nebraska , the worst team in the Big Ten last season, arguably was the hardest hit COVID team in the Big Ten last season, yet all but one of its games were made up.

Conversely, Michigan, also hit hard by COVID, won the Big Ten regular season and had a league-high 3 of its games not rescheduled. The Wolverines played at least 2 less conference games than everyone else.
 

Nebraska , the worst team in the Big Ten last season, arguably was the hardest hit COVID team in the Big Ten last season, yet all but one of its games were made up.

Conversely, Michigan, also hit hard by COVID, won the Big Ten regular season and had a league-high 3 of its games not rescheduled. The Wolverines played at least 2 less conference games than everyone else.
That probably had a lot to do with a) the programs motivation and ability to reschedule; and maybe more importantly b) local/state health department requirements for gatherings, including games. I'm pretty sure Michigan was one of the most restrictive states in the country, and I suspect Nebraska was much less restrictive, making it much easier for the Huskers to reschedule than the Wolverines. Just a little speculation.

I must say that I did give Freddie a hat tip for getting his games in. He had a terrible team and muscled his way through the whole schedule when he could have easily hung it up in the name of the pandemic.
 

Yep, Nebraska clearly wanted to play as many games as it could. Much respect for that.

I'm not convinced Michigan did.
 




Top Bottom