dannygopher9100
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,055
- Reaction score
- 210
- Points
- 63
I say 2003 because I have always heard that the game has changed Minnesota football ever since. I think losing to Texas Tech in 06 could be argued too.
One of the great myths perpetuated on GopherHole, that the Gophers definitely would have beaten Michigan State the next week after choking away the Michigan game. Perhaps, but there's no way of knowing. It's not like MSU was terrible that season (8-4, 5-3). In fact, Sparty was undefeated in the Big Ten (3-0) heading into the Gopher game, before fading (1-3 the rest of the way).
The 2003 Michigan game definitely gets my vote simply for what it would have meant to win that game. The whole state was ready to hop on the bandwagon, casual fans were starting to notice the Gophers, then the face plant. The program never really recovered.
It's good they only went back 25 years instead of 35. I think you all know where I'm going here.
Yes, I follow MSU football, true, but that's a moot point. ... "The Gophers roll" is all conjecture.
I would argue, isn't part of a coach's job to prevent his team from having letdowns?
As most things on fan message boards are. But absolutely nothing - including all of your perfectly valid statistics that follow - will convince me that an undefeated Gophers team doesn't squash Michigan State that day.
It happens, no matter the coach. History repeated itself the next season -- last-second loss to Michigan, then got thumped by a bad MSU team. Five years later under Brewster, after the Gophers blew a chance to go 8-1 vs. Northwestern, they welcome the worst Michigan team ever to the Dome and laid a 29-6 egg. Under Kill, I'd say the Gophers were emotionally drained by the loss to Iowa in 2013 and it showed the following week at Michigan.
BTW, I am noticing a common thread in these hangover games. Hopefully the Wolverines suffer a letdown after an emotional game vs. MSU this season.