If not now, like Soup****** says, At what point in PJ's tenure does he start to get judged by the on field performance?
If not now, like Soup****** says, At what point in PJ's tenure does he start to get judged by the on field performance?
If not now, like Soup****** says, At what point in PJ's tenure does he start to get judged by the on field performance?
I think it mainly has to do with people not liking him because of the Kill seizures article and how stupid he looked.
I'm not offended that he isn't pro-PJ. (But I'm going to post 6 times in the thread.)
Except for all the stupid shiite he wrote. About as unbalanced as a one-legged placekicker.
Sorry, but there is nowhere bizzarely like the planet TC columnists live on.
I don't think anyone doesn't think his on field performance will matter.
But it's a somewhat odd time to write it.
1. It's his second year.
2. Freshman QB whether you want to blame PJ for that or not. Still odd to be expecting Big Ten titles with a freshman QB (unless you recruited a five star, but then you need to be Alabama or Clemson to pull that off. Not a coach in his first or second year.
3. Gophers are one of a few Big Ten teams unbeaten, and have the second best non-conference victory (by some measures) of any of the Big Ten teams.
So if you're writing an article today about results, what are you going to pick apart about the 3 results so far? That's why it's odd timing to be hyper critical of the record.
Also, PJ is going to be here through 2020, most likely 2021 before he'd be at risk for losing his job.
That and the positive image he's pushing out around the football program and the high GPA, it's unlikely he's at any risk if he goes 4-8 the next two seasons.
Totally agree - hated that article, and generally don’t like his writing. This article though wasn’t bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I give him, like any coach, 4 years. It's unfair to judge anyone less than that, subject of course, to scandal of some sort.
If not now, like Soup****** says, At what point in PJ's tenure does he start to get judged by the on field performance?
Any coach? With Brewster we made the call after 3.5.
Soupcan is a dink but we can absolutely be judging Fleck. The judging started last year. If some of you want to wait 4-5 years that's fine but after those years you will still be looking at his whole body of work which includes now.
I understand what you're saying but not sure it's true. This is a what have you done for me lately society it seems. If we go 3-9 this year but 8-4 and 9-3 the next two years, nobody is going to care about this year's 3-9 record.
I understand what you're saying but not sure it's true. This is a what have you done for me lately society it seems. If we go 3-9 this year but 8-4 and 9-3 the next two years, nobody is going to care about this year's 3-9 record.
You can start now - that's fine. He's 8-7...feasted on non-conference opponents and struggled in conference. More or less like every coach we have had in the last 50 years. Factually, the recruiting arc has been better than we have seen in that time-frame (outside of one Brewster year, that we all know was flawed for various reasons) so if in 3-4 years we don't see any improvement, it is very fair to start evaluating what we have.
If I'm being honest, though, I would accept Mason/Kill success because I simply just enjoy his personality. I watch every press conference and truly enjoy his program 12 months out of the year. If and when he leaves/is fired/retires I will still love the Gophers, but I really don't think I could support a coach more fully than I do Fleck. People like Fleck, in all phases of life, are the future. Tough guy/meat-head/drill sergeants are dinosaurs.
As a football coach, I will analyze/judge Fleck fairly. But as a man and personality, I am biased and will continue to root for his success. Kind of the same philosophy I hold towards Elon Musk. He is not above being criticized, but he is the best hope for humanity...much like Fleck is the best hope for our local university. If P.J. Fleck cannot lead us to greatness, I'm not sure anybody can.
It’s fine if you really, really like PJ’s personality but I don’t understand the bolded at all. The coaches that have succeeded in CFB, the ones that have built programs, are generally those mean, gruff, “drill sergeant” types you apparently dislike. Off the top of my head I can’t recall any “showman”-type
personalities that have built programs at the power 5 level. Perhaps the closest would be Pete Carroll but he had the luxury of being at a blue blood. I’m not saying PJ won’t succeed and I obviously hope he does but there are some truisms about human behavior and psychology and how to pull maximum performance out of people. Being nice/ positive reinforcement isn’t always the answer.
The fact that this is now past 50 posts, means Souhan exactly did his job.
It was a pure opinion piece. He can say anything he wants, with as little data or intelligence as he wants. It's supposed to be a talker. Supposed to rile people, perhaps.
Mission accomplished. If you really, really wanted to stick it to him ... you'd pretend the article was never written!
Here's my point about the Twin Cities media.
When a team is middle of the road (or even when good or bad) as a columnist, you have three options on how to write an article. Positively, negatively, or simply fact based with no opinion.
The Twin Cities media for about 40 years (other than Sid) has routinely been on negative side / cheap shot side of Gopher football.
Meanwhile, if you look at the Vikings coverage, it's largely glowing continuously, even just 2-3 weeks prior to a head coach firing. Media in general was hesitant to even rip Ponder until he was benched, but goofballs like Souhan don't have a floor for what they'll dig up to find a way to rip the Gophers. (not that it's ever been a difficult task).
They've essentially been lazy and grabbed on repeatedly to the items that can be used to rip the Gophers vs digging just a bit to find something positive to write about.
Lowly Buffalo 27-0 over the un-daunted Vikings.
Let's see Souhan what SOuhan has to write about.
+1. As a vikes fan I'm for one am done with Zimmer and Spielman losing this badly to a terrible team at home.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No other city drags their college coaches the way 1500 ESPN and the Strib do in Minneapolis.
It's not that they need to be pro-PJ, but writing 'it's time to judge PJ' when he has a team full of Freshman is lame.
Write a Maryland primer, a player bio, or a puff-piece.
I'm way more likely to read that than the Strib's muckracking garbage.
Sports don't need to be a constant scandal, especially when there is no scandal to report, and Souhan is just trying to stir up trouble.