Sid: T. Denny lost interest in contributing to U athletics, still has contact w/ Kill

I've seen all I need to see professor.
I'm shocked.

But t Denny isn't reading my emails, listening to my phone calls, taking my money, regulating what I do in the privacy of my home, etc.
Because these two events are in any way related.

Once again, YOU are making this into a political issue. You honestly can't help yourself. I will give you credit for not mentioning Obamacare or Benghazi for the last 5-6 posts though, I bet that was hard.
 

Because he has held his donation prowess over the university to get what he wants?

And exactly what do he want and why did he want it?

Don't really want to go down this worm hole, but there's no such thing.

You do realize non-profit means that they are not subject to income taxes don't you? It also doesn't mean that they can't have a surplus or a profit. You might want to look up what a 501 c 3 corporation is and understand the laws that govern them.

There are plenty of avenues towards "personal gain". As someone previously said, this is just as likely about ego as anything else. Either way, I'm not limiting his choices strictly to those that directly line his pockets. What does seem rather clear, however, is that he has been willing in the past to donate money to the university so long as they do x, y, and z for him. When they don't, he takes his big money ball and goes home. He's more than welcome to do that, since it's his money, but the public is also more than willing to call him out on it.

It is common practice for people who give money to request that it be used in a certain way or that certain conditions are adhered to in the use of that money. The things that you are suggesting are most likely illegal and would also have tax consequences to them. Unless you can be more specific about your allegations, all they are are allegations without substance.

Yeah....ok. Clearly Sanford has no agenda.

Again, Everything you are saying is nothing but hearsay. On the other hand you clearly have an agenda when it comes to Denny Sanford.
 

If by "hearsay" you mean that it wouldn't hold up in a court of law, yeah, I don't have written or recorded testimony of Sanford specifically demanding anything. I never claimed to.

I guess that means it's a coincidence that he has decided to rescind his financial support of the U in the face of it not pushing through a merger that he was intimately involved with (I'm sure you'll dispute this too, but give me a break....) ? Is that what we're going with here?

Also, yes, I'm aware of what a "non-profit" hospital is. I also think the term is largely a joke, but that's not really germane to the discussion except that others have brought it up.


Lastly, while the two sides seem pretty entrenched here, and I'm guessing that y'all already have pretty formed opinions on the Star Tribune, there's also this:

http://www.startribune.com/business/206116291.html
 

I'm shocked.


Because these two events are in any way related.

Once again, YOU are making this into a political issue. You honestly can't help yourself. I will give you credit for not mentioning Obamacare or Benghazi for the last 5-6 posts though, I bet that was hard.

You said oligarchs are controlling my life. They are not. I detailed who is. And that isn't political in the sense you are thinking, because both elephants and donkeys are controlling my life together, and have been for a long time.
If I want nothing to do with t Denny and his businesses, I have that power. Therefore, he does not control me.
But you keep teaching our kids that we only need to send more of our power to Washington, to get rid of those evil oligarchs. That will solve the problem I'm sure.
 

You said oligarchs are controlling my life. They are not. I detailed who is. And that isn't political in the sense you are thinking, because both elephants and donkeys are controlling my life together, and have been for a long time.
If I want nothing to do with t Denny and his businesses, I have that power. Therefore, he does not control me.
For the life of me I can't see how you can separate major political donors from the politicians themselves.
 


\
For the life of me I can't see how you can separate major political donors from the politicians themselves.

Who said you could? Is that what you mean by t Denny controlling me? My solution is the same either way. Apparently you are under the delusion that we can continue to have an all powerful government, but that politicians won't abuse that power and use it to enrich themselves. And you called me naive.
 

You said oligarchs are controlling my life. They are not. I detailed who is. And that isn't political in the sense you are thinking, because both elephants and donkeys are controlling my life together, and have been for a long time.
If I want nothing to do with t Denny and his businesses, I have that power. Therefore, he does not control me.
But you keep teaching our kids that we only need to send more of our power to Washington, to get rid of those evil oligarchs. That will solve the problem I'm sure.

What color are those elephants and donkeys controlling your world? Are they also controlling the flying pigs I saw over Northfield?
 

Apparently you are under the delusion that we can continue to have an all powerful government, but that politicians won't abuse that power and use it to enrich themselves.
Where on God's green earth did I ever say anything to even remotely imply that? When did I advocate an "all powerful government"? Again, you are assuming a ton of things here based on some obvious pre-conceived biases or something. Was a professor mean to you? I honestly don't get it.
 

You about done now?

pissing-contest-t.jpg
 



Who said you could? Is that what you mean by t Denny controlling me? My solution is the same either way. Apparently you are under the delusion that we can continue to have an all powerful government, but that politicians won't abuse that power and use it to enrich themselves. And you called me naive.

Dude you aren't making any sense. You are clearly out of your element. Just let it go.
 


He cant help with the U's facilities but he is opening the 115 Million Dollar Sanford Premier Event Center in Sioux Falls pretty soon, look pretty nice. He is still making boatloads of money from First Premier Bank/Bankcard, selling cards to people with crappy credit that have APR's of 79.9% yikes!

http://www.siouxfalls.org/active-projects/active-projects/eventscenter.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denny_Sanford_Premier_Center

Are u saying he is obligated to donate boatloads of money to the U?
 




VERY unfortunate that the University of Minnesota Hospital was EVER put into a merger with the "for profit" Fairview System that obviously was willing to put the U of M's TEACHING HOSPITAL up for sale to a South Dakota-based Hospital Corporation. The University of Minnesota Hospital and Medical School really does NEED to be provincial and PROTECTIVE of it's ties to the State of Minnesota.

Sanford can do what ever Sanford wants to do...but...he can not BUY something that belongs to the citizens and the state of Minnesota. I realize that Healthcare is changing and the economics of running a hospital has forced and will force ALL KINDS of changes. However, as long as the University of Minnesota has a medical school it NEEDS a Minnesota based, controlled and operated MINNESOTA TEACHING HOSPITAL SYSTEM. A Minnesota tradition, history and future MUST be preserved. To have our teaching hospital at the University of Minnesota owned and operated by some outfit based out of South Dakota would have been a sell-out of the future of our University...our Medical School...our good, common sense... Denny T. should KNOW that and UNDERSTAND that. Some things need NEVER be for sale...and T Denny, there are some things that you just can't buy...

; 0 )

Is such loyalty to things Minnesotan also applicable to recruiting?
 

Everybody might be over-thinking this. Don't have a degree in Sidology but I'm pretty sure Sid is saying that the U should have just GIVEN Sandford the hospitals in exchange for new basketball and football facilities.
 


Is such loyalty to things Minnesotan also applicable to recruiting?

now, fansincethefifties: don't you KNOW the NCAA does NOT allow recruits to be bought by in-state recruiters OR out-of-state recruiters.
What kind of college sports fan are you if you don't know that you can NOT buy recruits...
 

Sanford Premier Health just wouldn't have looked good and might have even been a breach of contract if it had been plastered all over the U of M Hospitals...so VERY close to TCF BANK STADIUM on the East BANK of SKI-U-MAH City, Minnesota! TCF does have EXCLUSIVE rights deals with the University of Minnesota. Just Go over to the U of M Walter Mondale Law School Building or any legal library and do some research about Contract Law. It would appear it was all over way back when the U of M rejected T. Denney's "take it or leave it too many strings attached...offer to spend $35 million and not a penny more to build a little shack of a stadium that he could name after himself...
 

Sanford Premier Health just wouldn't have looked good and might have even been a breach of contract if it had been plastered all over the U of M Hospitals...so VERY close to TCF BANK STADIUM on the East BANK of SKI-U-MAH City, Minnesota! TCF does have EXCLUSIVE rights deals with the University of Minnesota. Just Go over to the U of M Walter Mondale Law School Building or any legal library and do some research about Contract Law. It would appear it was all over way back when the U of M rejected T. Denney's "take it or leave it too many strings attached...offer to spend $35 million and not a penny more to build a little shack of a stadium that he could name after himself...

wren is in the house!

LOL - I see from the above posting your are now following truth in advertising rules. I hope all goes well for you in the nut house.
 

"He cant help with the U's facilities but he is opening the 115 Million Dollar..."

yes

Help = boatloads of money? Simply sayin it would be nice if he could help a little, instead of giving zero.
 

We're all still aware that this is stemming from a Sid Hartman column, right? Even within the column, it says both that he's 'lost interest in contributing' and that if he does contribute, it will only be for football. There is no story here...
 

A question for the GopherHole Moderators: Should I be stalked by an obsessed poster?

LOL - I see from the above posting your are now following truth in advertising rules. I hope all goes well for you in the nut house.

An out of control compulsive and obsessive poster who calls him/herself killjoy has been stalking virtually every post I make, in case you haven't noticed it. What I really want to know is if this type of stalking is an acceptable option for posters to utilize on this site? This particular has utilized David Allen Coe references in the past.

I'll most likely continue to ignore him and his type (leeks...et. al). Still, I think this is something that you all might want to take an interest in. It seems as though several of these types of posters are attempting to revert to tactics from several years ago. You moderators from GOPHERHOLE really might want to keep your eye on things a little more closely.

It's up to you, of course. If you want to allow a few people to push the limits, it's your call.

I'll try to ignore this DAC threat that killjoy referred to in one of his stalking posts to me the other day.

The way I look at it: he is pretty much making an obnoxious fool of himself...and I do trust that at least a few people notice his obsessive and compulsive attachments to my posts. Any feed back you could give me would be much appreciated Moderators.

I'll go back to ignoring him. I will let go of things I have no control over... Basically: screw killjoy nd his antics...
Right; GH Moderators? Or, do you have any suggestions for me in having to put up with a crazy, obnoxious stalker such as this killjoy (david allen coe wanna be)


; 0 )
 

My goodness, will all of you f*#ktards shut up already. Line up the usual suspects.....same sh*t, different day. You all know who you are. :rolleyes:
 

Wren - You really are a piece of work. You can't have it both ways. You harassed and drove several people away from the Strib blog until you got banned there after having been banned here. Then you claim to be for freedom of speech but as Short Ornery Norwegian has pointed out you only interested in having your agenda discussed. By the way DAC is now posting and enjoying the The Daily Gopher where he is allowed to have a normal conversation. I will say one thing about you wren, you are at least smart enough not to post on The Daily Gopher. They didn't and won't put up with your B.S.
 

Wren definitely posts on TDG. He's the loon. You can spot a wren post from about a mile away.
 

Wren definitely posts on TDG. He's the loon. You can spot a wren post from about a mile away.

Interesting theory but I don't believe it is correct for many reasons. The first is that the loon used to post here (or was it on the Strib?) with bud. Sometimes they would join wren in his anti Brewster posts. That is the only similarity between loon and wren. Loon is a Canadian and a former teacher while wren is from Winona and only god knows what he did. Loon's posts are a far cry from what wren posts here sometimes. Therefore I am quite surprised about your statement. To me loon posts bare little resemblance to loons.

P.S. After posting that they wouldn't put up with wren's non-sense on The Daily Gopher I remembered when wren tried to post at Matt H's. or Vee's old FBT site. Matt told him that he knew all about him from the GopherHole and then proceeded to destroy wren. Wren never did try to post there again.
 

You make up so many stories killjoy. NOBODY got banned on the strib back in those days because anyone could sign in as anyone else. You and your henchmen over on the strib site would put my moniker on fake posts you wrote. So, I of course figured out what you had done and wrote some posts and signed your monikers. Another favorite trick you creeps had was to tack older posts together into on very lengthy post and call it mine. It was the wild, wild west over there in those days. You people were really nasty. That whole routine was so disgusting. So, I did get you fools back by returning the favor. Sure, I got to be as good at it as you people were. It was SO easy to do...

Finally, it caused some changes in security over at the strib. Any body who got the boot could come back with a new moniker...And you played such a sissy=dude/dudette,( which ever your case may have been) who always was trying to find out from a moderator over at the strib what it would take to get somebody else banned.

You are such a pathologically untruthful person killjoy. And, you and your buddies really did say some nasty stuff about me and my young kids. You will probably burn in hell for the nasty stuff you tried to do killjoy. But, THAT was WAY too much.

But, that was then...this is now.

You spend MORE time trying to hitch on to any and every post I make. The bad part is only when you start making up things that are just NOT true. The thing is...I pretty much don't give a rip about what you do. It just gets kind of tiring.

I will be here. I will say what I think. You can't keep me from doing that.

I guess I should be pretty damn flattered that you are so incredibly obsessed with me...but...personally, I don't think it's a very healthy thing for you to be doing...and, having some dude/dudette such as yourself stalking me just kind of creeps me out a little. But, in the end, you or any of your friends don't get me down....I NEVER let any of the ba$tards you hang with on this board get me down...
 

I guess I should be pretty damn flattered that you are so incredibly obsessed with me...but...personally, I don't think it's a very healthy thing for you to be doing...and, having some dude/dudette such as yourself stalking me just kind of creeps me out a little.

How do you reconcile this post with your "relationship" with Glen?

On a separate note, I'm really sorry for all of those things that Studwell said about your daughters. Definitely creepy and uncalled for.
 

wren and killjoy can get a room for all I care. What is this about a Kill/T. Denny relationship? That is a good sign. I do believe Jerry has some schmooze to him...
 

wren and killjoy can get a room for all I care. What is this about a Kill/T. Denny relationship? That is a good sign. I do believe Jerry has some schmooze to him...

I'm hearing T Boone Pickens might be available.
 




Top Bottom