upnorthkid
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 10,230
- Reaction score
- 5,571
- Points
- 113
I think the Rohde contract if true is interesting. The discussion here has kind of gone off the rails, but one of the points being made about him earning his fair share made me think about how these NIL boosters do things, and I think this gets at the possible shadiness. These are all supposed to be run outside of the institution. I don't really see how a supposedly non-affiliated group looks at Rohde and just randomly decides to offer 450k unless they're just doing it across the board/have a fund set for whoever the head coach decides to sign and that's what they end up with. To me it more strikes as he said he was coming (or possibly coming), they set him up with the collective (which is not how this is supposed to work) who looked at what funds they had for the year, and offered him the money. Did they have to get in a bidding war? Are NIL collectives offers discussed between organizations or offered up by the player? I think this is what Moniker is referring to in that there is a set of "guidelines" on how this should all go from the NCAA who has no teeth to do anything if people are doing things outside the guidelines, creating imbalance (ie some collectives soliciting players who are at other schools to transfer or recruits looking to sign begin offered money contingent on signing).
Also is interesting to me that the NIL groups can classify as non-profits. Are they not supposed to be getting the benefit from the student athlete generating revenue for them based on their likeness or are we comfortable saying this is just the middle man and that this athlete is truly in market analysis generating money for a company (like Rohde is directly benefitting companies that money as decided by someone)? NIL is here to stay and I'm all for people getting paid. I would anticipate at some point they are all going to be contracted athletes at the University level and maybe at the NIL level (will NIL collectives start implementing buyouts to lock athletes in?) There's not really any regulation on this to this point which there is in any other industry, and I can see why people are desiring that.
Also is interesting to me that the NIL groups can classify as non-profits. Are they not supposed to be getting the benefit from the student athlete generating revenue for them based on their likeness or are we comfortable saying this is just the middle man and that this athlete is truly in market analysis generating money for a company (like Rohde is directly benefitting companies that money as decided by someone)? NIL is here to stay and I'm all for people getting paid. I would anticipate at some point they are all going to be contracted athletes at the University level and maybe at the NIL level (will NIL collectives start implementing buyouts to lock athletes in?) There's not really any regulation on this to this point which there is in any other industry, and I can see why people are desiring that.