I agree. I like what Fleck is doing with recruiting, the portal and maintaining a majority of the high impact players in the program. I see quality depth with the 2026 team. Probably more than we have ever had across the roster. In this new world of college football, the next step with the program is to be able to compete better with the top tier teams and catch Iowa. But we need the proper financial backing from the University. I think most will agree with that. Tough schedule. I have us beating Iowa in 2026. I have us at 8-4 or 9-3 depending on the improvement and development in the trenches. On paper, it looks much better but it still needs to transfer to the field. Big things coming for the Gophers! Fleck is our guy. Just my opinion.What about periodically rewarding someone who continues to be modestly successful at a resource deficient program in a conference full of resource heavy programs? Fleck isn't a conference title contender but we've consistently punched above our weight class, even if it isn't to the extent that some here want to see. His teams buy in and perform on the field, they're achieving in the classroom, and they do a ton of community volunteer work. I'm cool with it. It's like a cost of living adjustment where the comparative wages are other coaches within the conference. If a caveat is that some if it has to be spent on improving the coordinator salary pool, even better.
Increased assistants pool, please.
OK Heather it’s good that you chimed in.
Lol otherwise on PJ extension talk coming off a mostly painful to watch season and another shitty bowl game.
A contract to automatically extend a contract?I'm not sure why they don't just put automatic 1 year extensions in his contract. Many coaches have that. Unless U rules/state law prohibits it for some reason.
Who said that? I've seen coaches have clauses that automatically extend by a year if still employed by X date.A contract to automatically extend a contract?
His salary was like 12th in the conference as of last year. Can’t hardly justify paying him much less. It’s not his fault the assistants aren’t getting paid properly.PJ should take more heat for consistently negotiating his salary to be above the standard of his assistants compared to the rest of the league. It’s pretty clear PJ does not value assistants bc they aren’t priority when extension time comes around.
His salary was like 12th in the conference as of last year. Can’t hardly justify paying him much less. It’s not his fault the assistants aren’t getting paid properly.
Would you rather be like Bucky and hire the wrong guy, and set the program back 5-7 years? Or continue with current consistance? Not a tough choice for me.
There are a lot of words and terms used here that are not real words or terms:Sorry to be a word Nazi but "consistance" is not a word. There is the word "consistence" but that refers to the physical qualities of a substance (for example, the consistence of pancake batter). The word you are looking for is "consistency."
Agree 100% with your view though. I've perused Iowa fan boards frquently in the past and read many rancorous comments about Ferentz and the former AD who kept giving him long and lucrative contracts. But, that AD recognized that Ferentz was a model of consistency and he preferred to continue that state rather than risk the program falling into the same condition that Nebraska and Wisconsin fell into.
Fleck has achieved a favorable level of consistency here too. Now, if he could only beat Ferentz a little more often.
There are a lot of words and terms used here that are not real words or terms:
-"loose" as in "I hope the Gophers don't loose."
-"towards" isn't a word. Even worse, "twords". Pronounce the "o". Toward.
-"for all intensive purposes" ugh
-"I could care less" yes, you could
-"anyways" again, isn't a word
-"would of" it is "would have"
-"should of" it is "should have"
- and, of course, "Iowa," "Wisconsin," and "Nebraska". Unusable.
and the assistant pool is dead lastHis salary was like 12th in the conference as of last year. Can’t hardly justify paying him much less. It’s not his fault the assistants aren’t getting paid properly.
And that’s Fleck’s fault? It’s been this way my whole life.and the assistant pool is dead last
assistant pool is negotiated as part of the head coach’s contract. There are obviously lots of moving parts, but Fleck is not totally independent of that ranking lol.And that’s Fleck’s fault? It’s been this way my whole life.
Not enough ways to like this. It's critical!!!!!!!!Increased assistants pool, please.
He’s had the job for a decade and has had multiple extension negotiations including some where he’s had leverage after good seasons and/or with at least rumors of other job interest. Not to mention that the B1G shared revenue has progressively increased. He has personally had multiple raises. To say he has had no ability to negotiate higher assistant salaries shows more about his negotiating abilities or priorities. How can it be that he can negotiate a raise and extension for himself like every other year but can’t negotiate competitive assistant salaries which are much less than his own?And that’s Fleck’s fault? It’s been this way my whole life.
This. These long term contracts just aren't necessary in the era of the portal. Any coaches getting these long terms are either at schools that don't understand the new landscape, or are at a school that are letting the coach take advantage of them. Per the new hires this year, 5 year terms appears to be the common length.I honestly don’t think this as necessary as it used to be.
You used to need a coach to have 4 years left on his deal for more assurance he would be there.
NFL coaching contracts aren’t 6+ years.
I’m sure it’s just a 1-2 year extension with little buyout change but I don’t think it’s necessary anymore in this new era
I suppose the market can make it necessary but
LOL - towards is 100% a real, actual word.There are a lot of words and terms used here that are not real words or terms:
-"loose" as in "I hope the Gophers don't loose."
-"towards" isn't a word. Even worse, "twords". Pronounce the "o". Toward.
-"for all intensive purposes" ugh
-"I could care less" yes, you could
-"anyways" again, isn't a word
-"would of" it is "would have"
-"should of" it is "should have"
- and, of course, "Iowa," "Wisconsin," and "Nebraska". Unusable.
It is a perfectly cromulent word.LOL - towards is 100% a real, actual word.
It shouldn’t have to be negotiated if the AD is committed to having a great football program.assistant pool is negotiated as part of the head coach’s contract. There are obviously lots of moving parts, but Fleck is not totally independent of that ranking lol.
Says a lot more about the AD as it shouldn’t be like killing teeth if they wanted a great football program. What’s it matter if the pool matches Fleck at 12th vs 16th or whatever it is, it’s not close to elite either way.He’s had the job for a decade and has had multiple extension negotiations including some where he’s had leverage after good seasons and/or with at least rumors of other job interest. Not to mention that the B1G shared revenue has progressively increased. He has personally had multiple raises. To say he has had no ability to negotiate higher assistant salaries shows more about his negotiating abilities or priorities. How can it be that he can negotiate a raise and extension for himself like every other year but can’t negotiate competitive assistant salaries which are much less than his own?